Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38503337›Full record

SynthesisProceedings. Biological sciences2024

Dung beetles increase plant growth: a meta-analysis.

Daniel J Anderson, Jacob D Berson, Raphael K Didham, Leigh W Simmons, Theodore A Evans

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Dung beetles increase plant growth: a meta-analysis.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel J AndersonSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3363-837X
Jacob D BersonSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7059-2131
Raphael K DidhamSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6685-7005
Leigh W SimmonsSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0562-1474
Theodore A EvansSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0558-3036

Funding

Australian Government, Department AgricultureFisheries and Forestry, Rural Research and Development for Profit Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ecosystem services provided by dung beetles are well known and valued. Dung beetles bury dung for feeding and breeding, and it is generally thought that the process of burying dung increases nutrient uptake by plant roots, which promotes plant growth. Many studies have tested the effects of dung beetles on plant growth, but there has been no quantitative synthesis of these studies. Here we use a multi-level meta-analysis to estimate the average effect of dung beetles on plant growth and investigate factors that moderate this effect. We identified 28 publications that investigated dung beetle effects on plant growth. Of these, 24 contained the minimum quantitative data necessary to include in a meta-analysis. Overall, we found that dung beetles increased plant growth by 17%; the 95% CI for possible values for the true increase in plant growth that were most compatible with our data, given our statistical model, ranged from 1% to 35%. We found evidence that the dung beetle-plant growth relationship is influenced by the plant measurement type and the number of beetles accessing the dung. However, beetles did not increase plant growth in all quantitative trials, as individual effect sizes ranged from -72% to 806%, suggesting important context-dependence in the provision of ecosystem services.

Indexed as

ColeopteraEcosystemAnimalsFecesPlant BreedingPlantscoprophagydung burialecosystem functionecosystem serviceScarabaeoideasystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38503337
PMCPMC10950467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.