Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38503090›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2024

ITNR: Inversion Transformer-based Neural Ranking for cancer drug recommendations.

Shahabeddin Sotudian, Ioannis Ch Paschalidis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shahabeddin SotudianDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Division of Systems Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: sotudian@bu.edu.
Ioannis Ch PaschalidisDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Division of Systems Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, and Faculty of Computing and Data Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: yannisp@bu.edu.

Funding

Project-005UL1TR001430 · NCATS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI BAIR-MERRITT, MEGAN H, CENTER, DAVID M. · 2015 to 2024
$52.3M
Refinement Methods for Protein Docking based on Exploring Multi-Dimensional EnergR01GM093147 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI KOZAKOV, DMYTRO, PASCHALIDIS, IOANNIS · 2011 to 2014
$1.2M
Optimizing and Learning Strategies for Protein Docking R01GM135930 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI VAKILI, PIROOZ · 2019 to 2021
$561k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001430NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM093147NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM135930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personalized drug response prediction is an approach for tailoring effective therapeutic strategies for patients based on their tumors' genomic characterization. While machine learning methods are widely employed in the literature, they often struggle to capture drug-cell line relations across various cell lines. In addressing this challenge, our study introduces a novel listwise Learning-to-Rank (LTR) model named Inversion Transformer-based Neural Ranking (ITNR). ITNR utilizes genomic features and a transformer architecture to decipher functional relationships and construct models that can predict patient-specific drug responses. Our experiments were conducted on three major drug response data sets, showing that ITNR reliably and consistently outperforms state-of-the-art LTR models.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsCell LineGenomicsHumansMachine LearningAntineoplastic AgentsApproximate permutationDrug response predictionInversionLearning-to-rankTransformers

Identifiers

PMID38503090
PMCPMC10990436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.