Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38502826›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2025

Floral traits and their connection with pollinators and climate.

Shweta Basnett, Julia Krpan, Anahí Espíndola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shweta BasnettDepartment of Entomology, Plant Sciences Building 4112, 4291 Fieldhouse Drive, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1097-6405
Julia KrpanDepartment of Entomology, Plant Sciences Building 4112, 4291 Fieldhouse Drive, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Anahí EspíndolaDepartment of Entomology, Plant Sciences Building 4112, 4291 Fieldhouse Drive, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9128-8836

Funding

American Rhododendron SocietyAzalea Society of America, the Maryland Native Plant SocietyDepartment of Biotechnology, Government of India BT/01/NE/PS/NCBS/09United States-India Educational Foundation Fulbright-Nehru Postdoctoral Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsFloral characteristics vary significantly among plant species, and multiple underlying factors govern this diversity. Although it is widely known that spatial variation in pollinator groups can exert selection on floral traits, the relative contribution of pollinators and climate to the variation of floral traits across large geographical areas remains a little-studied area. Besides furthering our conceptual understanding of these processes, gaining insight into the topic is also of conservation relevance: understanding how climate might drive variation in floral traits can serve to protect plant-pollinator interactions in globally change conditions.

methodsWe used Rhododendron as a model system and collected floral traits (corolla length, nectar volume and concentrations), floral visitors and climatic data on 21 Rhododendron species across two continents (North America, Appalachians and Asia, Himalaya). Based on this, we quantified the influence of climate and pollinators on floral traits using phylogeny-informed analyses. KEY

resultsOur results indicate that there is substantial variation in pollinators and morphological traits across Rhododendron species and continents. We came across four pollinator groups: birds, bees, butterflies and flies. Asian species were commonly visited by birds, bees and flies, whereas bees and butterflies were the most common visitors of North American species. The visitor identity explained nectar trait variation, with flowers visited by birds presenting higher volumes of dilute nectar and those visited by insects producing concentrated nectar. Nectar concentration and corolla length exhibited a strong phylogenetic signal across the analysed set of species. We also found that nectar trait variation in the Himalayas could also be explained by climate, which presented significant interactions with pollinator identity.

conclusionsOur results indicate that both pollinators and climate contribute and interact to drive nectar trait variation, suggesting that both can affect pollination interactions and floral (and plant) evolution individually and in interaction with each other.

Indexed as

ClimateFlowersPollinationRhododendronAnimalsAsiaBeesBirdsButterfliesDipteraNorth AmericaPhylogenyPlant NectarPlant NectarAppalachianclimatecorollaelevation gradientfloral traitHimalayanectarpollination syndromepollinatorRhododendron

Identifiers

PMID38502826
PMCPMC11805930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.