Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38502678›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Exploring different health care providers´ perceptions on the management of diarrhoea in cholera hotspots in the Democratic Republic of Congo: A qualitative content analysis.

Mattias Schedwin, Aurélie Bisumba Furaha, Helena Hildenwall, Kelly Elimian, Espoir Bwenge Malembaka, Marc K Yambayamba, Birger C Forsberg, Wim Van Damme, Tobias Alfvén, Simone E Carter and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mattias SchedwinDepartment of Global Public Health, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3777-2034
Aurélie Bisumba FurahaPaediatric Department, Hôpital Provincial Général de Référence de Bukavu, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5235-5837
Helena HildenwallDepartment of Global Public Health, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7570-9792
Kelly ElimianDepartment of Global Public Health, Stockholm, Sweden.
Espoir Bwenge MalembakaDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Marc K YambayambaVetsuisse Faculty, Section Epidemiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8381-0409
Birger C ForsbergDepartment of Global Public Health, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6179-3970
Wim Van DammeDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Tobias AlfvénDepartment of Global Public Health, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2328-3512
Simone E CarterPublic Health Emergencies, UNICEF, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Placide Welo OkitayembaProgramme National d'Elimination du Choléra et de Lutte Contre les Autres Maladies Diarrhéiques, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Mala Ali MapatanoDepartment of Nutrition, Kinshasa School of Public Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Carina KingDepartment of Global Public Health, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global cholera guidelines support wider healthcare system strengthening interventions, alongside vertical outbreak responses, to end cholera. Well-trained healthcare providers are essential for a resilient health system and can create synergies with childhood diarrhoea, which has higher mortality. We explored how the main provider groups for diarrhoea in cholera hotspots interact, decide on treatment, and reflect on possible limiting factors and opportunities to improve prevention and treatment. We conducted focus group discussions in September 2022 with different healthcare provider types in two urban and two rural cholera hotspots in the North Kivu and Tanganyika provinces in the Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Content analysis was used with the same coding applied to all providers. In total 15 focus group discussions with medical doctors (n = 3), nurses (n = 4), drug shop vendors (n = 4), and traditional health practitioners (n = 4) were performed. Four categories were derived from the analysis. (i) Provider dynamics: scepticism between all cadres was prominent, whilst also acknowledging the important role all provider groups have in current case management. (ii) Choice of treatment: affordability and strong caregiver demands shaped by cultural beliefs strongly affected choice. (iii) Financial consideration on access: empathy was strong, with providers finding innovative ways to create access to treatment. Concurrently, financial incentives were important, and providers asked for this to be considered when subsiding treatment. (iv) How to improve: the current cholera outbreak response approach was appreciated however there was a strong wish for broader long-term interventions targeting root causes, particularly community access to potable water. Drug shops and traditional health practitioners should be considered for inclusion in health policies for cholera and other diarrhoeal diseases. Financial incentives for the provider to improve access to low-cost treatment and investment in access to potable water should furthermore be considered.

Identifiers

PMID38502678
PMCPMC10950234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.