Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38502665›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Interpretable machine learning-based individual analysis of acute kidney injury in immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Minoru Sakuragi, Eiichiro Uchino, Noriaki Sato, Takeshi Matsubara, Akihiko Ueda, Yohei Mineharu, Ryosuke Kojima, Motoko Yanagita, Yasushi Okuno

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Minoru SakuragiDepartment of Biomedical Data Intelligence, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Eiichiro UchinoDepartment of Biomedical Data Intelligence, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Noriaki SatoDepartment of Biomedical Data Intelligence, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Takeshi MatsubaraDepartment of Nephrology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Akihiko UedaDepartment of Biomedical Data Intelligence, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yohei MineharuDepartment of Biomedical Data Intelligence, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6346-3999
Ryosuke KojimaDepartment of Biomedical Data Intelligence, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Motoko YanagitaDepartment of Nephrology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yasushi OkunoDepartment of Biomedical Data Intelligence, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3596-4208
Kyoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) is a critical complication of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Since the etiology of AKI in patients undergoing cancer therapy varies, clarifying underlying causes in individual cases is critical for optimal cancer treatment. Although it is essential to individually analyze immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated patients for underlying pathologies for each AKI episode, these analyses have not been realized. Herein, we aimed to individually clarify the underlying causes of AKI in immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated patients using a new clustering approach with Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).

methodsWe developed a gradient-boosting decision tree-based machine learning model continuously predicting AKI within 7 days, using the medical records of 616 immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated patients. The temporal changes in individual predictive reasoning in AKI prediction models represented the key features contributing to each AKI prediction and clustered AKI patients based on the features with high predictive contribution quantified in time series by SHAP. We searched for common clinical backgrounds of AKI patients in each cluster, compared with annotation by three nephrologists.

resultsOne hundred and twelve patients (18.2%) had at least one AKI episode. They were clustered per the key feature, and their SHAP value patterns, and the nephrologists assessed the clusters' clinical relevance. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that the area under the curve was 0.880. Patients with AKI were categorized into four clusters with significant prognostic differences (p = 0.010). The leading causes of AKI for each cluster, such as hypovolemia, drug-related, and cancer cachexia, were all clinically interpretable, which conventional approaches cannot obtain.

conclusionOur results suggest that the clustering method of individual predictive reasoning in machine learning models can be applied to infer clinically critical factors for developing each episode of AKI among patients with multiple AKI risk factors, such as immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated patients.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsCachexiaHumansMachine LearningRadioimmunotherapyImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID38502665
PMCPMC10950216
OpenAlexW4392947243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.