Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38502635›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Leveraging qualitative approaches to guide sustainable international research collaborations.

Roxanne Vandermause, Rachel Kryah, Julie Bertram, Hannah L Stewart, Nil Ean, Steven Bruce, Adam W Carrico, Julie A Mannarino, Robert H Paul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Roxanne VandermauseCollege of Nursing, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0560-5450
Rachel KryahMissouri Institute of Mental Health, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Julie BertramCollege of Nursing, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1609-1122
Hannah L StewartSchool of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Nil EanThe Center for Trauma Care and Research Organization, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Steven BruceCenter for Trauma Recovery, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Adam W CarricoStempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, Florida.
Julie A MannarinoMissouri Institute of Mental Health, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7272-033X
Robert H PaulMissouri Institute of Mental Health, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.

Funding

Enhancing Capacity for Mental Health Research and Care in CambodiaR01MH114722 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-ST. LOUIS · PI CARRICO, ADAM WAYNE, PAUL, ROBERT HARRIS · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Qualitative research approaches were used to launch an international research collaboration between the U. S. and Cambodia. Cambodian officials requested assistance in learning qualitative approaches to complement the research skills of Cambodian mental health providers. This article provides a description of how U. S. researchers responded to that request and engaged with Cambodian psychiatrists to explore mental health needs and interventions in both countries and initiate a sustainable relationship. The early focus on qualitative research methodologies may be an avenue that mitigates some of the challenges that can characterize international research. In this study, early communications involved developing a plan to teach qualitative methods while also collecting and analyzing data in both countries that would address the mental health concerns experienced by respective care providers. A case study exemplar was embedded with a scripted focus group guide to collect data from U. S. focus groups, then share with Cambodian psychiatrists. Components of hermeneutic phenomenological interviewing and descriptive content analysis were used to simultaneously teach and enact the research methods, gather data in both countries to analyze, and inspire participants to replicate the methods in their ongoing work. Cambodian psychiatrists were able to demonstrate competence in facilitating focus groups after being participant-observers. Researcher/practitioners from both U. S. and Cambodian teams gained new understandings about the mental health needs of their patients. The mutual engagement of a research focus is an effective way to establish cross-cultural relationships. The challenges of staying with stable teams over times remain, but the content shared and learned in a participatory structure yields understandings that cross cultural boundaries. Anticipated and unexpected challenges may be offset by an intention of reciprocity and mutual engagement. The use of qualitative methodologies, early and repeatedly, can facilitate relational understanding.

Identifiers

PMID38502635
PMCPMC10950217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.