Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38502470›Full record

ArticleOdontology2024

The formation of cariogenic plaque to contemporary adhesive restorative materials: an in vitro study.

Anna Lehrkinder, Olivia Rydholm, Anna Wänström, Keisuke Nakamura, Ulf Örtengren

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Odontology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna LehrkinderDepartment of Cariology, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 450, 405 30, Göteborg, Sweden.
Olivia RydholmDepartment of Cariology, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 450, 405 30, Göteborg, Sweden.
Anna WänströmDepartment of Cariology, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 450, 405 30, Göteborg, Sweden.
Keisuke NakamuraDepartment of Advanced Free Radical Science, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai, Japan.
Ulf ÖrtengrenDepartment of Cariology, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 450, 405 30, Göteborg, Sweden. ulf.ortengren@odontologi.gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6335-9737
University of Gothenburg · SEMalmö University · SETohoku University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The research exploiting the ability of dental materials to induce or prevent secondary caries (SC) development still seems inconclusive. Controlling bacterial adhesion by releasing bacteriostatic ions and improving the surface structure has been suggested to reduce the occurrence of SC. This paper analyses the impact of five distinctively composed dental materials on cariogenic biofilm formation. Forty-five specimens of three composites (CeramX Spectra ST, Admira Fusion, Beautifil II) and two glass-ionomers (Fuji II LC, Caredyne Restore), respectively, were incubated in bacterial suspension composed of Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus sanguinis, and Streptococcus salivarius at pH 7.0 and 5.5. Coverslips were used as a control. Adhered bacteria were collected after 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h and analyzed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Fluoride leakage was measured at each collection. The specimens' surface topography was assessed using interferometry. In the present study, surface roughness seemed to have a partial role in bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation, together with chemical composition of the materials tested. Despite differences in fluoride leakage, biofilm accumulation was similar across materials, but the number of adhered bacteria differed significantly. A release of other ions may also affect adhesion. These variations suggest that certain materials may be more prone to initiating secondary caries.

Indexed as

Bacterial AdhesionBiofilmsComposite ResinsDental CariesDental PlaqueGlass Ionomer CementsMaterials TestingSurface PropertiesBisphenol A-Glycidyl MethacrylateDental MaterialsFluoridesHumansIn Vitro TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionStreptococcusStreptococcus mutansBeautifil composite resinBisphenol A-Glycidyl MethacrylateComposite ResinsDental MaterialsFluoridesGlass Ionomer CementsBiofilmCaries preventionDental materialsFluorideIons

Identifiers

PMID38502470
PMCPMC11415411
OpenAlexW4392957763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.