Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38502432›Full record

Trial reportIrish journal of medical science2024

Effect of oral naloxone on opioid-induced constipation in methadone maintenance treatment patients, a double-blind, placebo-control, clinical trial.

Shaghayegh Akhgarandouz, Mohammad Moshiri, Leila Etemad, Bita Dadpour, Majid Khadem-Rezaiyan, Nasser Vahdati-Mashhadian

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Irish journal of medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shaghayegh AkhgarandouzSchool of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4104-7978
Mohammad MoshiriMedical Toxicology Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0389-2270
Leila EtemadMedical Toxicology Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2800-9395
Bita DadpourMedical Toxicology Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6004-0344
Majid Khadem-RezaiyanCommunity medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2698-176X
Nasser Vahdati-MashhadianDepartment of Pharmacodynamics and Toxicology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. vahdatin@mums.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0184-1015
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpioid-induced constipation (OIC) is the most prevalent side effect of methadone maintenance therapy (MMT). Naloxone could reduce the OIC.

methodFifty-six MMT cases (< 75 mg/day methadone, > 3 months) were entered randomly into four groups of a trial. They received placebo or naloxone tablets (0.5, 2, or 4 mg/day) once a day for 2 weeks. They continued their conventional laxative. Their constipation and opiate withdrawal (OWS) were evaluated by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (stool consistency and frequency), Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) questionnaire, Constipation Scoring System (CSS), and the Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS) before starting treatment and at the end of the first and second weeks.

resultsThe dose of 4 mg/day naloxone was excluded from the study due to severe OWS. The precipitants of groups had similar ages, methadone dose and duration, laxative use, and constipation scores at the start of the trial. However, 2 mg of naloxone could change the stool consistency (PV = 0.0052) and frequency (P = 0.0133), 0.5 mg/day dose only improved the stool consistency (P = 0.0016). The patients' CSS and PAC-SYM scores were reduced by naloxone after the 1st week of treatment. However, there was no significant difference in the mean score of SOWS at different assessment times and groups. Also, 3 and 4 cases of 0.5 and 2 mg/day groups, respectively, withdrew from the study due to OWS.

conclusionOral naloxone at doses of 0.5 and 2 mg/day was significantly more effective than placebo on OIC in MMT. However, the dose of 4 mg induced intolerable OWS.

Indexed as

MethadoneNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsAdministration, OralAdultAnalgesics, OpioidConstipationDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Induced ConstipationAnalgesics, OpioidMethadoneNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsLaxativesNaloxoneNarcotic antagonistsOpiate substitution treatmentOpioid-induced constipation

Identifiers

PMID38502432
OpenAlexW4392963618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.