Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38502421›Full record

ReviewCurrent HIV/AIDS reports2024

"Your Package Could Not Be Delivered": The State of Digital HIV Intervention Implementation in the US.

Dennis H Li, Kathryn Macapagal, Melissa Mongrella, Rana Saber, Brian Mustanski

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current HIV/AIDS reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Effectiveness of the smart program: Stepped-care HIV prevention for gay and bisexual adolescent boys.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dennis H Li *Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kathryn Macapagal *Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Melissa MongrellaInstitute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Rana SaberInstitute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Brian MustanskiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. brian@northwestern.edu.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Virology and Immunology Technology CoreP30AI117943 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Sahera Dirajlal-Fargo · 2015 to 2026
$38.4M
A pragmatic trial of two strategies for implementing an effective eHealth HIV prevention programR01MH118213 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MUSTANSKI, BRIAN · 2018 to 2022
$8.8M
Effectiveness and implementation of text messaging to improve HIV testing in sexual and gender minority adolescentsR01MH129207 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Kathryn Rose Macapagal · 2022 to 2026
$3.6M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI117943NIH HHS R01MH118213NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118213NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH129207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewDespite continuous innovations and federal investment to create digital interventions addressing the HIV prevention and care continua, these interventions have not reached people in the U.S. at scale. This article reviews what is known about U.S. implementation of digital HIV interventions and presents a strategy to cross the research-to-practice chasm for these types of interventions. RECENT

findingsWe conducted a narrative review of U.S.-based original research on implementation of digital HIV interventions and identified few studies reporting on implementation determinants, strategies, processes, or outcomes, particularly outside the context of effectiveness trials. To supplement the literature, in 2023, we surveyed 47 investigators representing 64 unique interventions about their experiences with implementation after their research trials. Respondents placed high importance on intervention implementation, but major barriers included lack of funding and clear implementation models, technology costs, and difficulty identifying partners equipped to deliver digital interventions. They felt that responsibility for implementation should be shared between intervention developers, deliverers (e.g., clinics), and a government entity. If an implementation center were to exist, most respondents wanted to be available for guidance or technical assistance but largely wanted less involvement. Numerous evidence-based, effective digital interventions exist to address HIV prevention and care. However, they remain "on the shelf" absent a concrete and sustainable model for real-world dissemination and implementation. Based on our findings, we call for the creation of national implementation centers, analogous to those in other health systems, to facilitate digital HIV intervention delivery and accelerate progress toward ending the U.S. epidemic.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsHumansTelemedicineUnited StatesDigital interventionDisseminationeHealthHIV careHIV preventionImplementationIntervention technologymHealth

Identifiers

PMID38502421
PMCPMC11710848
OpenAlexW4392958890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.