Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38502307›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2024

Alpha- and beta-pinene isomers act differently to control Rhipicephalus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae).

Ana Caroline Silveira Arantes, Jenifer Caroline Silva Ribeiro, Dásia Silveira Soares, Aline Chaves Reis, Maria das Graças Cardoso, Rafael Neodini Remedio

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effects ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana Caroline Silveira ArantesDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Jenifer Caroline Silva RibeiroDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Dásia Silveira SoaresDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Aline Chaves ReisDepartment of Medicine, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, 37200-900, Brazil.
Maria das Graças CardosoDepartment of Chemistry, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Rafael Neodini RemedioDepartment of Medicine, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, 37200-900, Brazil. rafael.remedio@ufla.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9913-8565

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus is an ectoparasite of high importance in veterinary medicine and public health. Since synthetic chemicals used to control these ticks can select resistant strains and cause toxic effects in their hosts, there is a need to identify effective substances with fewer adverse effects. For this reason, we investigated the effects of alpha- and beta-pinene, known for their various biological effects, on the mortality and reproductive performance of R. microplus engorged female ticks. The products were diluted in a 2% Tween 80 aqueous solution. The ticks were first weighed and then immersed in the test solutions for five minutes. Then, they were dried with paper towels and fixed dorsoventrally in Petri dishes, totalling five treatment groups for each pinene and a control group treated with the solvent alone. The ticks were monitored daily for mortality, and their eggs were collected and weighed. The larval hatching rate was estimated, and the pre-oviposition and incubation periods were determined. From these data, the following parameters were calculated: egg production index, fertility rate, estimated reproduction rate, percentages of reduction in oviposition and hatching, and product efficacy. Alpha-pinene showed better results at higher concentrations, unlike beta-pinene, which was more effective at lower concentrations. The effectiveness of alpha-pinene was 74% at a concentration of 14.0 μL/mL, while beta-pinene showed 78% efficacy at 2.0 μL/mL. The results indicated for the first time different effects of two isomers in ticks, suggesting that these compounds act on R. microplus females in different ways.

Indexed as

AcaricidesBicyclic MonoterpenesIxodidaeRhipicephalusAnimalsFemaleLarvaOvipositionAcaricidesalpha-pinenebeta-pineneBicyclic MonoterpenesAcaricideCattle tickEfficacyNatural productsReproductive effects

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.