ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2024
Flow-controlled ventilation decreases mechanical power in postoperative ICU patients.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Electrical Impedance Tomography During Flow Controlled Ventilation in the Intensive Care Unit
Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation Versus Flow-Controlled Ventilation in Burn Patients: A Monocentric, Randomized Controlled, Parallel Group Trial
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of mechanical ventilation modes in the laparoscopic perioperative period with electrical impedance tomography.PloS one · 2025Trial
- Flow-Controlled Ventilation as a Rescue Strategy in Advanced COVID-19 ARDS: A Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Recent advances in experimental and clinical applications of chest electrical impedance tomography: a narrative review.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Review
- The Effect of Flow-Controlled Ventilation on Mechanical Power in Laparoscopic Surgeries: A Comparative Analysis with Pressure Controlled Volume Guaranteed and Volume Controlled Ventilation.Medeniyet medical journal · 2025Article
- Flow-controlled ventilation versus pressure-controlled ventilation in moderate to severe ARDS patients: a randomized crossover physiological study.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
- Current Approaches to Airway and Ventilation Strategies in Laryngotracheal Surgery: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- [Anesthesia in transoral robot-assisted surgery].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2025Review
- Electrical impedance tomography monitoring in adult ICU patients: state-of-the-art, recommendations for standardized acquisition, processing, and clinical use, and future directions.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Review
- A self-regulated expiratory flow device for mechanical ventilation: a bench study.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMechanical power (MP) is the energy delivered by the ventilator to the respiratory system and combines factors related to the development of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) is a new ventilation mode using a constant low flow during both inspiration and expiration, which is hypothesized to lower the MP and to improve ventilation homogeneity. Data demonstrating these effects are scarce, since previous studies comparing FCV with conventional controlled ventilation modes in ICU patients suffer from important methodological concerns.
objectivesThis study aims to assess the difference in MP between FCV and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV). Secondary aims were to explore the effect of FCV in terms of minute volume, ventilation distribution and homogeneity, and gas exchange.
methodsThis is a physiological study in post-cardiothoracic surgery patients requiring mechanical ventilation in the ICU. During PCV at baseline and 90 min of FCV, intratracheal pressure, airway flow and electrical impedance tomography (EIT) were measured continuously, and hemodynamics and venous and arterial blood gases were obtained repeatedly. Pressure-volume loops were constructed for the calculation of the MP.
resultsIn 10 patients, optimized FCV versus PCV resulted in a lower MP (7.7 vs. 11.0 J/min; p = 0.004). Although FCV did not increase overall ventilation homogeneity, it did lead to an improved ventilation of the dependent lung regions. A stable gas exchange at lower minute volumes was obtained.
conclusionsFCV resulted in a lower MP and improved ventilation of the dependent lung regions in post-cardiothoracic surgery patients on the ICU. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05644418. Registered 1 December 2022, retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.