ReviewInternational ophthalmology2024
Diagnostic and therapeutic considerations in patients with bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferation.
Review in International ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis review aims to summarize the current knowledge concerning the clinical features, diagnostic work-up, and therapeutic approach of bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferation (BDUMP).
methodsA meticulous literature search was performed in the PubMed database. A supplementary search was made in Google Scholar to complete the collected items. Our search strategy utilized the following keywords: "bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferation", "BDUMP", and "Paraneoplastic Syndrome". Articles were considered based on their relevance, with the search spanning publications up to 2023. Studies were excluded if they did not contribute pertinent information or lacked methodological rigor. A critical appraisal of included studies was conducted, assessing study design, sample size, methodology, and potential bias, ensuring a thorough and transparent review process.
resultsBDUMP is a rare and potentially sight-threatening condition characterized by the bilateral proliferation of melanocytes within the uvea. BDUMP is typically observed in middle-aged or elderly individuals and is often associated with an underlying malignancy, most commonly of gastrointestinal origin. BDUMP is frequently misdiagnosed as a benign nevus or choroidal metastasis, leading to delayed diagnosis and treatment. The ophthalmic symptoms and signs typically precede the diagnosis of a systemic malignancy, emphasizing the crucial role of ophthalmologists in the recognition of BDUMP. Several diagnostic modalities can aid in the diagnosis of BDUMP, including ophthalmic examination, imaging studies such as optical coherence tomography, fluorescein angiography, and indocyanine green angiography, and biopsy of the uveal tissue. Treatment of BDUMP is directed towards the underlying malignancy and may include chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgical resection. Additionally, strict monitoring with regular follow-ups may contribute to the detection of new lesions and the reduction in the size of existing ones.
conclusionsBDUMP can be considered a potential biomarker in the management of malignancies, especially when the primary underlying tumor has not been detected. Further research is needed to better understand the pathogenesis of BDUMP and its association with malignancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.