Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38501903›Full record

ReviewMagnetic resonance in medicine2024

Technical advances in motion-robust MR thermometry.

Kisoo Kim, Kazim Narsinh, Eugene Ozhinsky

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The Endolymph Signal in Non-contrast Enhanced 3D-real IR Image Differs between the Ears with and without Significant Endolymphatic Hydrops.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kisoo KimDepartment of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8387-9476
Kazim NarsinhDepartment of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Eugene OzhinskyDepartment of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8993-7905
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Advancing Methods for MR-guided Focused Ultrasound Hyperthermia for Head and Neck CancerK99DE032397 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KIM, KISOO · 2023 to 2024
$168k
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) K99DE032397NIDCR NIH HHS K99 DE032397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proton resonance frequency shift (PRFS) MR thermometry is the most common method used in clinical thermal treatments because of its fast acquisition and high sensitivity to temperature. However, motion is the biggest obstacle in PRFS MR thermometry for monitoring thermal treatment in moving organs. This challenge arises because of the introduction of phase errors into the PRFS calculation through multiple methods, such as image misregistration, susceptibility changes in the magnetic field, and intraframe motion during MRI acquisition. Various approaches for motion correction have been developed for real-time, motion-robust, and volumetric MR thermometry. However, current technologies have inherent trade-offs among volume coverage, processing time, and temperature accuracy. These tradeoffs should be considered and chosen according to the thermal treatment application. In hyperthermia treatment, precise temperature measurements are of increased importance rather than the requirement for exceedingly high temporal resolution. In contrast, ablation procedures require robust temporal resolution to accurately capture a rapid temperature rise. This paper presents a comprehensive review of current cutting-edge MRI techniques for motion-robust MR thermometry, and recommends which techniques are better suited for each thermal treatment. We expect that this study will help discern the selection of motion-robust MR thermometry strategies and inspire the development of motion-robust volumetric MR thermometry for practical use in clinics.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMotionAlgorithmsArtifactsHumansHyperthermia, InducedThermographyThermometrymagnetic resonance thermometrymotion correctionmotion robustproton resonance frequency shiftreal‐time MRI

Identifiers

PMID38501903
PMCPMC11132643
OpenAlexW4392952933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.