Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38501764›Full record

SynthesisThe neuroradiology journal2024

Transradial access for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the Woven EndoBridge device: A systematic review and pooled analysis.

Sávio Batista, Filipi Fim Andreão, Raphael Bertani, Leonardo de Barros Oliveira, Dan Zimelewicz Oberman, Lucca B Palavani, Cesar Augusto Ferreira Alves Filho, Fausto de Oliveira Braga, Elias Antônio Tanus Machado, Paulo José da Mata Pereira and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The neuroradiology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sávio BatistaFaculty of Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6861-0505
Filipi Fim AndreãoFaculty of Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Raphael BertaniDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Leonardo de Barros OliveiraFaculty of Medicine, State University of Ponta Grossa, Brazil.
Dan Zimelewicz ObermanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital Força-Aérea Galeão, Brazil.
Lucca B PalavaniFaculty of Medicine, Max Planck University Center, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6320-5041
Cesar Augusto Ferreira Alves FilhoDepartment of Endovascular Neurosurgery, Paulo Niemeyer State Brain Institute, Brazil.
Fausto de Oliveira BragaDepartment of Endovascular Neurosurgery, Paulo Niemeyer State Brain Institute, Brazil.
Elias Antônio Tanus MachadoDepartment of Endovascular Neurosurgery, Paulo Niemeyer State Brain Institute, Brazil.
Paulo José da Mata PereiraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Paulo Niemeyer State Brain Institute, Brazil.
Paulo Niemeyer FilhoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Paulo Niemeyer State Brain Institute, Brazil.
José Alberto Almeida FilhoDepartment of Endovascular Neurosurgery, Paulo Niemeyer State Brain Institute, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRAcademia da Força Aérea · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is a minimally invasive endovascular treatment option for patients with cerebral aneurysms. Transradial access (TRA) is a technique that involves accessing the arterial system through the radial artery in the wrist rather than the femoral artery in the groin. Several studies have investigated the use of TRA for WEB device deployment in treating intracranial aneurysms.

methodsA systematic review was conducted to evaluate the TRA for WEB device deployment in treating intracranial aneurysms. The databases PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. To reduce the risk of bias, this systematic review only included studies reporting on using TRA in WEB device deployment for intracranial aneurysm treatment with a minimum of four patients.

resultsIn this systematic review, 186 patients were included across five studies, with TRA used in 183 cases analyzed. The study population had a higher proportion of females (

conclusionThe available results suggest TRA with the WEB device is a safe and effective alternative. However, using TRA versus TFA should be individualized based on patient factors and operator experience.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresIntracranial AneurysmRadial ArteryEmbolization, TherapeuticHumansStentsaneurysmradial accesstransradialWoven EndoBridgeWoven EndoBridge device

Identifiers

PMID38501764
PMCPMC11444326
OpenAlexW4392954097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.