ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2024
Adaptable SEC-SAXS data collection for higher quality structure analysis in solution.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Small Angle Scattering Techniques on In Situ Adsorption Studies: A Comprehensive Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Conformational flexibility of talin enables force-free sampling of activation-competent states.Communications chemistry · 2026Article
- Ion-selective conformational stabilization of a disordered repeats-in-toxin protein domain.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- A hidden cysteine in Fis1 targeted to prevent excessive mitochondrial fission and dysfunction under oxidative stress.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Adaptable SEC-SAXS data collection for higher quality structure analysis in solution.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The two major challenges in synchrotron size-exclusion chromatography coupled in-line with small-angle x-ray scattering (SEC-SAXS) experiments are the overlapping peaks in the elution profile and the fouling of radiation-damaged materials on the walls of the sample cell. In recent years, many post-experimental analyses techniques have been developed and applied to extract scattering profiles from these problematic SEC-SAXS data. Here, we present three modes of data collection at the BioSAXS Beamline 4-2 of the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource (SSRL BL4-2). The first mode, the High-Resolution mode, enables SEC-SAXS data collection with excellent sample separation and virtually no additional peak broadening from the UHPLC UV detector to the x-ray position by taking advantage of the low system dispersion of the UHPLC. The small bed volume of the analytical SEC column minimizes sample dilution in the column and facilitates data collection at higher sample concentrations with excellent sample economy equal to or even less than that of the conventional equilibrium SAXS method. Radiation damage problems during SEC-SAXS data collection are evaded by additional cleaning of the sample cell after buffer data collection and avoidance of unnecessary exposures through the use of the x-ray shutter control options, allowing sample data collection with a clean sample cell. Therefore, accurate background subtraction can be performed at a level equivalent to the conventional equilibrium SAXS method without requiring baseline correction, thereby leading to more reliable downstream structural analysis and quicker access to new science. The two other data collection modes, the High-Throughput mode and the Co-Flow mode, add agility to the planning and execution of experiments to efficiently achieve the user's scientific objectives at the SSRL BL4-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.