ArticleNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University2024
[A digital droplet PCR detection technique based on filter faster R-CNN].
Article in Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo propose a method for mitigate the impact of anomaly points (such as dust, bubbles, scratches on the chip surface, and minor indentations) in images on the results of digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) detection to achieve high-throughput, stable, and accurate detection.
methodsWe propose a Filter Faster R-CNN ddPCR detection model, which employs Faster R-CNN to generate droplet prediction boxes followed by removing the anomalies within the positive droplet prediction boxes using an outlier filtering module (Filter). Using a plasmid carrying a norovirus fragment as the template, we established a ddPCR dataset for model training (2462 instances, 78.56%) and testing (672 instances, 21.44%). Ablation experiments were performed to test the effectiveness of 3 filtering branches of the Filter for anomaly removal on the validation dataset. Comparative experiments with other ddPCR droplet detection models and absolute quantification experiments of ddPCR were conducted to assess the performance of the Filter Faster R-CNN model.
resultsIn low-dust and dusty environments, the Filter Faster R-CNN model achieved detection accuracies of 98.23% and 88.35% for positive droplets, respectively, with composite F1 scores reaching 99.15% and 99.14%, obviously superior to the other models. The introduction of the filtering module significantly enhanced the positive accuracy of the model in dusty environments. In the absolute quantification experiments, a regression line was plotted using the results from commercial flow cytometry equipment as the standard concentration. The results show a regression line slope of 1.0005, an intercept of -0.025, and a determination coefficient of 0.9997, indicating high consistency between the two results.
conclusionThe ddPCR detection technique using the Filter Faster R-CNN model provides a robust detection method for ddPCR under various environmental conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.