ReviewClinical and translational science2024
Estimation of the benefit from pre-emptive genotyping based on the nationwide cohort data in South Korea.
Review in Clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Pharmacogenetic Testing and Application: 2024 Updated Guidelines by the Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2025Guideline
- Estimation of the benefit from pre-emptive genotyping based on the nationwide cohort data in South Korea.Clinical and translational science · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic variants affect drug responses, making pre-emptive genotyping crucial for averting serious adverse events (SAEs) and treatment failure. However, assessing the benefits of pre-emptive genotyping based on genetic distribution, drug exposure, and demographics is challenging. This study aimed to estimate the population-level benefits of pre-emptive genotyping in the Korean population using nationwide cohort data. We reviewed actionable gene-drug combinations recommended by both the Clinical Pharmacogenomics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) and the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) as of February 2022, identifying high-risk phenotypes. We collected reported risk reduction from genotyping and standardized it into population attributable risks. Healthcare reimbursement costs for SAEs and treatment failures were obtained from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service Statistics in 2021. The benefits of pre-emptive genotyping for a specific group were determined by multiplying drug exposure from nationwide cohort data by individual genotyping benefits. We identified 31 gene-drug-event pairs, with CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 demonstrating the greatest benefits for both male and female patients. Individuals aged 65-70 years had the highest individual benefit from pre-emptive genotyping, with $84.40 for men and $100.90 for women. Pre-emptive genotyping, particularly for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19, can provide substantial benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.