ArticleAnnals of surgery2025
Characterization of Pancreatic Fistula After Post-pancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis.
Article in Annals of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A biomarker-integrated nomogram for predicting postoperative pancreatic fistula in low- to intermediate-risk patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Estimation of pancreatic histology and likelihood of postoperative pancreatic fistula using extracellular volume fraction from contrast-enhanced computed tomography.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- The proinflammatory status, based on preoperative interleukin-6, predicts postpancreatectomy acute pancreatitis and associated postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- A new perspective on post-operative pancreatic fistulas: the impact of post-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis.Gland surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the clinical significance and risk factors of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after post-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP) in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).
backgroundPPAP has been recognized as a critical factor in the pathophysiology of POPF after PD.
methodsA total of 817 consecutive patients who underwent elective PD between January 2020 and June 2022 were included. PPAP and POPF were defined in accordance with the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definitions. Multivariate logistic analyses were performed to investigate the risk factors for POPF. Comparisons between PPAP-associated POPF and non-PPAP-associated POPF were made to further characterize this intriguing complication.
resultsOverall, 159 (19.5%) patients developed POPF after PD, of which 73 (45.9%) occurred following PPAP, and the remaining 86 (54.1%) had non-PPAP-associated POPF. Patients with PPAP-associated POPF experienced significantly higher morbidity than patients without POPF. Multivariate analyses revealed distinct risk factors for each POPF type. For PPAP-associated POPF, independent risk factors included estimated blood loss >200 mL (OR: 1.93), main pancreatic duct ≤3 cm (OR: 2.88), and soft pancreatic texture (OR: 2.01), largely overlapping with fistula risk score elements. On the other hand, non-PPAP-associated POPF was associated with age >65 years (OR: 1.95), male (OR: 2.10), and main pancreatic duct ≤3 cm (OR: 2.57). Notably, among patients with PPAP, the incidence of POPF consistently hovered around 50% regardless of the fistula risk score stratification.
conclusionsPPAP-associated POPF presents as a distinct pathophysiology in the development of POPF after PD, potentially opening doors for future prevention strategies targeting the early postoperative period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.