Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38501184›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2024

Cost-Utility Analysis for Colorectal Cancer Screening According to the Initiating Age of National Cancer Screening Program in Korea.

Seowoo Bae, Kyeongmin Lee, Byung Chang Kim, Jae Kwan Jun, Kui Son Choi, Mina Suh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Seowoo BaeNational Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8123-388X
Kyeongmin LeeGraduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2629-6669
Byung Chang KimCenter for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3164-5824
Jae Kwan JunNational Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1647-0675
Kui Son ChoiNational Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5336-3874
Mina SuhNational Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8101-7493

Funding

National Cancer Center of Korea 2210773-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to identify the most cost-effective strategy for colorectal cancer screening using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), focusing on screening initiation age in Korea.

methodsWe designed Markov simulation models targeting individuals aged 40 years or older. Twelve strategies combining screening initiation ages (40, 45, or 50 years old), termination ages (80 or no limit), and intervals (1 or 2 years) were modeled, and the most cost-effective strategy was selected. The robustness of the results was confirmed using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Furthermore, the cost-effectiveness of the qualitative and quantitative FIT methods was verified using scenario analysis.

resultsThe 2-year interval strategy with a screening age range of 45-80 years was the most cost-effective (incremental cost-utility ratio = KRW 7,281,646/quality adjusted life years). The most sensitive variables in the results were transition rate from advanced adenoma to local cancer and discount rate. The uncertainty in the model was substantially low. Moreover, strategies starting at the age of 40 years were also cost-effective but considered suboptimal. The scenario analysis showed that there was no significant difference in cost-effectiveness between strategies with various relative screening ratio of quantitative and qualitative method.

conclusionThe screening method for advancing the initiation age, as presented in the 2015 revised national screening recommendations, was superior regarding cost-effectiveness. This study provides a new paradigm for the development of a national cancer screening system in Korea, which can be utilized as a scientific basis for economic evaluations.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerAgedAged, 80 and overColonoscopyCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRepublic of KoreaColorectal CancerEarly Detection of CancerEconomic Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID38501184
PMCPMC10948257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.