Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38501061›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2023

Bayesian Modeling of Sequential Discoveries.

Alessandro Zito, Tommaso Rigon, Otso Ovaskainen, David B Dunson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Enriched Pitman-Yor processes.Scandinavian journal of statistics, theory and applications · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alessandro ZitoDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0001-8515-6503
Tommaso RigonDepartment of Economics, Management and Statistics, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9224-543X
Otso OvaskainenDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-9750-4421
David B DunsonDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, NC.

Funding

Reproducibility and Robustness of Dimensionality ReductionR01ES027498 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HERRING, AMY H · 2017 to 2021
$2.9M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES027498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aim at modeling the appearance of distinct tags in a sequence of labeled objects. Common examples of this type of data include words in a corpus or distinct species in a sample. These sequential discoveries are often summarized via accumulation curves, which count the number of distinct entities observed in an increasingly large set of objects. We propose a novel Bayesian method for species sampling modeling by directly specifying the probability of a new discovery, therefore, allowing for flexible specifications. The asymptotic behavior and finite sample properties of such an approach are extensively studied. Interestingly, our enlarged class of sequential processes includes highly tractable special cases. We present a subclass of models characterized by appealing theoretical and computational properties, including one that shares the same discovery probability with the Dirichlet process. Moreover, due to strong connections with logistic regression models, the latter subclass can naturally account for covariates. We finally test our proposal on both synthetic and real data, with special emphasis on a large fungal biodiversity study in Finland. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Indexed as

Accumulation curvesDirichlet processLogistic regressionPoisson-binomial distributionSpecies sampling models

Identifiers

PMID38501061
PMCPMC10947068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.