ReviewHeliyon2024
Approaches for boosting self-confidence of clinical nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of Obesity Management Education for Healthcare Professionals: A Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical obesity · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical Practice Competency and Associated Factors Among Midwifery and Nursing Students in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nursing open · 2026Pooled it
- Preparing Nursing Students for Obstetric Emergencies: Effects of High-Fidelity Simulation on Knowledge, Confidence and Learning.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- From Simulation to the Clinical Area: A Mixed-Methods Study Comparing Skills Laboratory Proficiency and Clinical Performance (RLE) Among Nursing Students in a Philippine University.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- First Contact With Care Through Clinical Simulation in Nursing Students: Qualitative Study.JMIR nursing · 2025Article
- Critical thinking disposition or proactive personality as predictors of academic resilience in nursing students.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Supporting Novice Nurses' Transition to Independent Practice: Evaluation of the TIPS Program Using the Kirkpatrick Model.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- Level of clinical competency and associated factors of nursing students in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Refining clinical judgment competence in nursing education in the Philippines: A mixed-methods study on the impact of the Philips 66 brainstorming technique in case-based learning.Belitung nursing journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Self-confidence is a key element in successfully promoting achievement strivings among the healthcare workforce. Targeted interventions can strengthen this characteristic in nursing students, thus improving the quality of hospital services. Objectives: We evaluated the effect of educational interventions on boosting self-confidence in nursing students using systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A comprehensive search was used to screen the related studies in Scopus, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO. Peer-reviewed literature in English until June 2023 was reviewed. Inclusion criteria were controlled trials, either non-randomized studies of intervention (NRSI) or randomized (RCTs). Studies were assessed for methodological quality by the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) and the Cochrane "Risk of Bias" tool for RCTs (RoB 2.0) and quality assessment tool for before-after (pre-post) studies with no control group. The main outcome was the self-confidence score of nursing students because of educational methods or intervention/s. Using the inverse variance weights method, a pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) estimate with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was determined. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to assess conceptual heterogeneity using Stata. Results: Twenty-two studies were selected involving 1758 participants and 940 cases of nursing students in the intervention group on boosting self-confidence (Fourteen Randomized controlled trials, Five Quasi-experimental, and three Before-After studies). The post-intervention self-confidence results in the nursing student's intervention group were significantly greater (SMD) (SMD for Controlled experimental design = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.14-0.89), (SMD for Quasi-experimental = 0.04; 95% CI = -0.33-0.41), (SMD for Before-After (Pre-Post) = 2.74; 95% CI = 1.85-3.63). The random-effect meta-analysis of 22 interventional studies determined that educational interventions are significantly associated with the improving self-confidence of nursing students. The intervention showed a moderate impact on the research units, according to Cohen's d results. Also, the results of simulation learning intervention (SMD = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.03-0.81) showed a significant relationship between intervention and outcome in studies. Conclusions: Analysis of our findings revealed the successful impact of most interventional approaches in boosting self-confidence, especially in the long term. It can be concluded that self-confidence is a multifactorial concept that can be improved by using targeted combination intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.