Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38500995›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Personalized anti-tumor drug efficacy prediction based on clinical data.

Xinping Xie, Dandan Li, Yangyang Pei, Weiwei Zhu, Xiaodong Du, Xiaodong Jiang, Lei Zhang, Hong-Qiang Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xinping XieSchool of Mathematics and Physics, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei, China.
Dandan LiSchool of Mathematics and Physics, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei, China.
Yangyang PeiSchool of Mathematics and Physics, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei, China.
Weiwei ZhuInstitute of Intelligent Machines/Zhongqi AI Lab., Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China.
Xiaodong DuExperimental Teaching Center, Hefei University, Hefei, China.
Xiaodong JiangMedical Oncology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230001, China.
Lei ZhangPharmacy Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230001, China.
Hong-Qiang WangInstitute of Intelligent Machines/Zhongqi AI Lab., Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anti-tumor drug efficacy prediction poses an unprecedented challenge to realizing personalized medicine. This paper proposes to predict personalized anti-tumor drug efficacy based on clinical data. Specifically, we encode the clinical text as numeric vectors featured with hidden topics for patients using Latent Dirichlet Allocation model. Then, to classify patients into two classes, responsive or non-responsive to a drug, drug efficacy predictors are established by machine learning based on the Latent Dirichlet Allocation topic representation. To evaluate the proposed method, we collected and collated clinical records of lung and bowel cancer patients treated with platinum. Experimental results on the data sets show the efficacy and effectiveness of the proposed method, suggesting the potential value of clinical data in cancer precision medicine. We hope that it will promote the research of drug efficacy prediction based on clinical data.

Indexed as

Clinical dataClinical decision-makingDrug efficacy predictionText mining

Identifiers

PMID38500995
PMCPMC10945121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.