Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38500972›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Laboratory biomarkers associated with COVID-19 mortality among inpatients in a Peruvian referral hospital.

Stephanie Montero, Jorge L Maguiña, Percy Soto-Becerra, Virgilio E Failoc-Rojas, Jorge Chira-Sosa, Moisés Apolaya-Segura, Cristian Díaz-Vélez, Stalin Tello-Vera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stephanie MonteroInstituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación - IETSI, ESSALUD, Lima, Peru.
Jorge L MaguiñaInstituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación - IETSI, ESSALUD, Lima, Peru.
Percy Soto-BecerraInstituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación - IETSI, ESSALUD, Lima, Peru.
Virgilio E Failoc-RojasInstituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación - IETSI, ESSALUD, Lima, Peru.
Jorge Chira-SosaLaboratorio de Biología Molecular, Citometría de flujo y Citogenética, Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo, ESSALUD, Chiclayo, Peru.
Moisés Apolaya-SeguraInstituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación - IETSI, ESSALUD, Lima, Peru.
Cristian Díaz-VélezInstituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación - IETSI, ESSALUD, Lima, Peru.
Stalin Tello-VeraLaboratorio de Biología Molecular, Citometría de flujo y Citogenética, Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo, ESSALUD, Chiclayo, Peru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the biochemical and hematological markers associated with the risk of death due to COVID-19 in a clinical cohort with a severe clinical profile. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted among 215 anonymized inpatient records from the Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo, Peru, between April and June 2020. The association between biomarkers and death due to COVID-19 was assessed using Cox regression, with a multivariable modeling of 1) biochemical and 2) hematological markers. Kaplan-Meier analyses and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated for each associated biomarker (p < 0.05). Results: Data analysis of 215 inpatient records revealed an overall mortality rate of 51.30% (95% CI 44.70-58.50), a mean age of 63.90 ± 14.10 years, and a median oxygen saturation of 88% (interquartile range 82-92%). The best-fitted biochemical model included higher levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, fibrinogen, urea, and lactate dehydrogenase. Similarly, the best-fitted hematological model included higher absolute neutrophil and prothrombin time, and lower absolute platelet counts. The best area under the curve values in both models were found to be CRP and D-dimer values (>0.74) and the absolute neutrophil count (0.63). Conclusions: Some specific biochemical markers outperformed hematological markers. Evaluated hematological counts analyzed in multivariable models proved to be better markers and could be useful to discriminate COVID-19 patients at high risk of death.

Indexed as

BiochemicalBiomarkersCOVID-19HematologicalSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID38500972
PMCPMC10945112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.