ReviewCureus2024
Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Failure and Cerebrospinal Fluid Protein: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of shunt failure in adult post-hemorrhagic and tumor-related hydrocephalus treated with flow-regulated programmable valves.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Elevated cerebrospinal fluid protein predicts lumbar drainage catheter occlusion in neurosurgical patients.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Targeting modulation of the choroid plexus blood-CSF barrier and CSF hypersecretion via lipid nanoparticle-mediated co-delivery of siRNA and resveratrol.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPS) are used to manage hydrocephalus but suffer from high failure rates. Our objectives were to (1) conduct a meta-analysis to objectively weigh this conflicting evidence, and (2) conduct a systematic review compiling and synthesizing what is known about the association between CSF proteins and shunt failure. A literature search was performed in compliance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The Embase, PubMed, and CENTRAL databases were searched from inception to June 2023. The articles were screened based on the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis was conducted using R statistical software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria); heterogeneity, subgroup, sensitivity, risk of bias, and publication bias analyses were performed. Thirty-one studies were selected for the systematic review, of which eight were selected for the meta-analysis. Perioperative CSF protein level was compared between 351 shunt failures and 1,094 shunt survivals; the mean difference of 24.37 mg/dL favoring shunt failure was significant (95% confidence interval=2.44-46.29 mg/dL). Our systematic review yielded a hypothesized pathogenesis: proteins attached to imperfections in the shunt surface lead to secondary attachment of cells, particularly astrocytes, and tertiary attachment of ependymal cells and the choroid plexus. Owing to the limitations of this meta-analysis, including lack of robustness due to missing data, heterogeneity, and certainty of the evidence, future research is needed to better understand the relationship between perioperative CSF protein levels and shunt failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.