Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38500929›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Indian Consensus on the Role of Amitriptyline in Migraine Prophylaxis.

Sumit Singh, A V Srinivasan, Tapas K Banerjee, Kanharam N Patel, Snehal S Muchhala, Bhavesh P Kotak

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sumit SinghNeurology, Artemis Agrim Institute of Neurosciences, Gurugram, IND.
A V SrinivasanNeurology, Dr. MGR Medical University, Chennai, IND.
Tapas K BanerjeeNeurology, National Neurosciences Centre, Kolkata, IND.
Kanharam N PatelNeurology, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Hyderabad, IND.
Snehal S MuchhalaMedical Affairs, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Hyderabad, IND.
Bhavesh P KotakMedical Affairs, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Hyderabad, IND.
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories (India) · INTamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University · INArtemis (United States) · USNational Neurosciences Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migraine is a globally prevalent neurological disorder. Amitriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant, has shown potential as a prophylactic treatment for migraine; however, its role as a first-line medication has been debated. A modified Delphi method was used to develop consensus statements on migraine and its management. The literature review identified knowledge gaps, and two survey rounds were conducted among a panel of experts. Consensus was reached for 12 out of 23 initial survey questions, whereas no consensus was reached for four questions after the deliberation in the second round. The results showed that migraine is highly prevalent among women aged 15-35 years in India. Amitriptyline is an effective monotherapy for prophylactic migraine management, with a recommended initial dose of 5-10 mg. A gradual titration over six months achieves optimal results. Amitriptyline is also safe for managing catamenial migraine and can be used at lower doses during pregnancy to alleviate symptoms. The outcomes of this study emphasize that amitriptyline should be considered as a primary prophylactic treatment for migraine because of its efficacy and safety. The evidence-based consensus achieved is intended to serve as guidance for healthcare practitioners in India, and it is anticipated that such adoption will lead to improvement in patient outcomes and an enhancement in the quality of life for those affected by migraines.

Indexed as

amitriptylineconsensusheadachemigraine disordersquality of life

Identifiers

PMID38500929
PMCPMC10945283
OpenAlexW4391880238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.