ArticleCureus2024
Unraveling the Clinicopathological Diversity and Subtypes of Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Study From a Tertiary Care Center.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a rare and malignant mesenchymal tumor characterized by skeletal muscle differentiation. While it is a common soft tissue sarcoma in children, its incidence significantly decreases with advancing age, rendering it exceptionally rare in individuals aged more than 45 years. This study aimed to shed light on the clinicopathological diversity and subtypes of RMS, thereby providing a comprehensive overview for enabling diagnostic precision and therapeutic strategies in treating this infrequently encountered malignancy in adults. Methodology This was a hospital-based cross-sectional study conducted in the Department of Pathology. Patients who were diagnosed with RMS over a period of three years were included in the study. The demographic features such as age and sex and aspects related to the tumor site, size, subtypes of RMS, and immunohistochemical expression were studied. Results A total of 14 cases were included in our study. The age at diagnosis ranged from four months to 65 years with a male-to-female ratio of 1:2.5. The sites of presentation were head and neck, trunk, pelvis, genitourinary tract, and retroperitoneum. The histological types were embryonal, alveolar, pleomorphic, and mixed and spindle cell types. The tumor cells were positive for immunohistochemistry markers desmin, MyoD1, and vimentin. Conclusion This study delved into the clinicopathological intricacies of RMS, offering comprehensive insights into its diverse subtypes. Our findings underscore the unique presentation of RMS in adults, with trunk and genitourinary tracts emerging as primary sites and alveolar and pleomorphic RMS observed as the predominant histological subtypes. Furthermore, the study sheds light on rare subtypes with distinct anatomical distributions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.