Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38500886›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Intratumor tertiary lymphatic structure evaluation predicts the prognosis and immunotherapy response of patients with colorectal cancer.

Huijing Feng, Siyuan Zhang, Qiuru Zhou, Fei Han, Gang Du, Lin Wang, Xuena Yang, Xiying Zhang, Wenwen Yu, Feng Wei and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Huijing Feng *Department of Thoracic Oncology, Cancer Center, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Siyuan Zhang *Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Qiuru ZhouTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Fei HanDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital/ Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Gang DuDepartment of Pathology, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Lin WangGeneral Surgery Department, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Xuena YangDepartment of Immunology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Xiying ZhangDepartment of Immunology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Wenwen YuDepartment of Immunology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Feng WeiDepartment of Immunology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Xishan HaoHaihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Tianjin, China.
Xiubao RenDepartment of Immunology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Hua ZhaoNational Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CNShanxi Academy of Medical Sciences · CNShanxi Medical University · CNTianjin haihe hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint therapy, involving the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody, has revolutionized the treatment of cancer. Tertiary lymphatic structure (TLS) serves as an immune indicator to predict the efficacy of PD-1 antibody therapy. However, there is no clear result whether the distribution, quantity, and maturity of TLS can be effective indicators for predicting the clinical efficacy of anti-PD1 immunotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: Fifty-seven patients who underwent surgical resection and thirty-nine patients who received anti-PD-1 immunotherapy were enrolled in this retrospective study. Immunohistochemical staining and multiple fluorescence immunohistochemistry were used to evaluate the mismatch repair (MMR) subtypes and TLS distribution, quantity, and maturity, respectively. Results: A comprehensive patient score system was built based on TLS quantity and maturity. We found that the proportion of patients with score >1 was much higher in the deficient mismatch repair(dMMR) group than in the proficient mismatch repair(pMMR) group, and this difference was mainly due to intratumoral TLS. Patient score, based on the TLS evaluation of whole tumor, peritumor, or intratumor, was used to evaluate the efficacy of anti-PD1 immunotherapy. Based only on the intratumor TLS evaluation, the proportion of patients with a score >1 was higher in the response (PR + CR) group than in the non-response (PD) group. Multivariate analysis revealed that patient scores were positively correlated with the clinical efficacy of immunotherapy. Further analysis of immune-related progression-free survival was performed in patients with CRC who received anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Patients with score >1 based on the intratumor TLS evaluation had significantly better survival. Conclusions: These results suggest that the patient score based on intratumor TLS evaluation may be a good immune predictive indicator for PD-1 antibody therapy in patients with CRC.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorHumansImmunotherapyPrognosisRetrospective StudiesProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptoranti-PD1 immunotherapyCRCdMMRpMMRTLS

Identifiers

PMID38500886
PMCPMC10946338
OpenAlexW4392352528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.