Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38500715›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2024

Resources needed by critical access hospitals to address identified infection prevention and control program gaps.

Mounica Soma, Jody Scebold, Angela Vasa, Teresa Ann Fitzgerald, Kate Tyner, Satya Kumar Lalam, Sue Beach, Muhammad Salman Ashraf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mounica SomaNational Infection Control and Strengthening Collaborative, Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3232-0290
Jody SceboldNational Infection Control and Strengthening Collaborative, Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.
Angela VasaNational Infection Control and Strengthening Collaborative, Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3473-5905
Teresa Ann FitzgeraldNebraska Infection Control Assessment and Promotion Program, Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.
Kate TynerNational Infection Control and Strengthening Collaborative, Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.
Satya Kumar LalamBiomedical Informatics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3087-7028
Sue BeachNational Infection Control and Strengthening Collaborative, Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.
Muhammad Salman AshrafNational Infection Control and Strengthening Collaborative, Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The study examined resources needed by Infection Preventionists (IP) to address infection prevention and control (IPC) program gaps. Design: A 49-question survey. Setting: Licensed Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) in Federal Emergency Management Area (FEMA) Region VII. Participants: IP at licensed CAHs. Methods: The survey conducted between December 2020 and January 2021 consisted of questions focusing on four categories including IPC program infrastructure, competency-based training, audit and feedback, and identification of high-risk pathogens/serious communicable diseases (HRP/SCD). An IPC score was calculated for each facility by totaling "Yes" responses (which indicate best practices) to 49 main survey questions. Follow-up questions explored the resources needed by the CAHs to implement or further strengthen best practices and mitigate IPC practice gaps. Welch t-test was used to study differences in IPC practice scores between states. Results: 50 of 259 (19.3%) CAHs participated in the survey with 37 (14.3%) answering all 49 questions. CAHs responding to all questions had a median IPC score of 35. There was no significant difference between IPC practice scores of CAHs in NE and IA. The top three IPC gaps were absence of drug diversion program (77%), lack of audits and feedback for insertion and maintenance of central venous catheters (76%), and missing laboratory risk assessments to identify tests that can be offered safely for patients under investigation for HRP/SCD (76%). Standardized audit tools, educational resources, and staff training materials were cited as much-needed resources. Conclusion: IPC practice gaps exist in CAHs. Various resources are needed for gap mitigation.

Identifiers

PMID38500715
PMCPMC10945943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.