Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38500708›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2023

Plastic versus metal stents for transmural drainage of walled-off necrosis with significant solid debris: a randomized controlled trial.

Rinkal Kakadiya, Gaurav Muktesh, Jayanta Samanta, Harshal S Mandavdhare, Pankaj Gupta, Jimil Shah, Phulen Sarma, Vikas Gupta, Thakur Deen Yadav, Anuraag Jena and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rinkal KakadiyaGastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Gaurav MukteshGastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Jayanta SamantaGastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9277-5086
Harshal S MandavdhareGastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8020-9848
Pankaj GuptaRadiodiagnosis, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Jimil ShahGastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Phulen SarmaPharmacology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Vikas GuptaGeneral Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Thakur Deen YadavGeneral Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Anuraag JenaGastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Vishal SharmaGastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Rakesh KochharGastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Endoscopic ultrasonographyIntervention EUSPancreas

Identifiers

PMID38500708
PMCPMC10946060
OpenAlexW4387394874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.