Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38500703›Full record

ArticleISME communications2024

Biotic interactions outweigh abiotic factors as drivers of bark microbial communities in Central European forests.

Lukas Dreyling, Caterina Penone, Noëlle Valérie Schenk, Imke Schmitt, Francesco Dal Grande

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lukas DreylingSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Frankfurt am Main 60325, Germany.
Caterina PenoneInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern 3013, Switzerland.
Noëlle Valérie SchenkInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern 3013, Switzerland.
Imke SchmittSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Frankfurt am Main 60325, Germany.
Francesco Dal GrandeSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Frankfurt am Main 60325, Germany.
University of Bern · CHGoethe University Frankfurt · DESenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre · DEUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bark surfaces are extensive areas within forest ecosystems, which provide an ideal habitat for microbial communities, through their longevity and seasonal stability. Here we provide a comprehensive account of the bark surface microbiome of living trees in Central European forests, and identify drivers of diversity and community composition. We examine algal, fungal, and bacterial communities and their interactions using metabarcoding on samples from over 750 trees collected in the Biodiversity Exploratories in northern, central, and southern Germany. We show that mutual biotic influence is more important than the abiotic environment with regard to community composition, whereas abiotic conditions and geography are more important for alpha diversity. Important abiotic factors are the relative humidity and light availability, which decrease the algal and bacterial alpha diversity but strongly increase fungal alpha diversity. In addition, temperature is important in shaping the microbial community, with higher temperature leading to homogeneous communities of dominant fungi, but high turnover in bacterial communities. Changes in the community dissimilarity of one organismal group occur in close relation to changes in the other two, suggesting that there are close interactions between the three major groups of the bark surface microbial communities, which may be linked to beneficial exchange. To understand the functioning of the forest microbiome as a whole, we need to further investigate the functionality of interactions within the bark surface microbiome and combine these results with findings from other forest habitats such as soil or canopy.

Indexed as

algaebacteriabark surfacecommunity ecologyenvironmental DNAforestfungimetabarcodingmicrobial ecologymicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID38500703
PMCPMC10945369
OpenAlexW4391212712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.