Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38500690›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physics2023

Advancing clinical translation of cardiac biomechanics models: a comprehensive review, applications and future pathways.

Cristobal Rodero, Tiffany M G Baptiste, Rosie K Barrows, Alexandre Lewalle, Steven A Niederer, Marina Strocchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A modelling study of right ventricular growth with valvular regurgitation.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cristobal RoderoCardiac Electro-Mechanics Research Group (CEMRG), National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Tiffany M G BaptisteCardiac Electro-Mechanics Research Group (CEMRG), National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Rosie K BarrowsCardiac Electro-Mechanics Research Group (CEMRG), National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alexandre LewalleCardiac Electro-Mechanics Research Group (CEMRG), National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Steven A NiedererCardiac Electro-Mechanics Research Group (CEMRG), National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Marina StrocchiCardiac Electro-Mechanics Research Group (CEMRG), National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Using Atrial Mechanics To Identify Fibrosis In Patients with Atrial FibrillationR01HL152256 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ENNIS, DANIEL B · 2020 to 2023
$2.8M
British Heart Foundation RG/20/4/34803NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL152256Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac mechanics models are developed to represent a high level of detail, including refined anatomies, accurate cell mechanics models, and platforms to link microscale physiology to whole-organ function. However, cardiac biomechanics models still have limited clinical translation. In this review, we provide a picture of cardiac mechanics models, focusing on their clinical translation. We review the main experimental and clinical data used in cardiac models, as well as the steps followed in the literature to generate anatomical meshes ready for simulations. We describe the main models in active and passive mechanics and the different lumped parameter models to represent the circulatory system. Lastly, we provide a summary of the state-of-the-art in terms of ventricular, atrial, and four-chamber cardiac biomechanics models. We discuss the steps that may facilitate clinical translation of the biomechanics models we describe. A well-established software to simulate cardiac biomechanics is lacking, with all available platforms involving different levels of documentation, learning curves, accessibility, and cost. Furthermore, there is no regulatory framework that clearly outlines the verification and validation requirements a model has to satisfy in order to be reliably used in applications. Finally, better integration with increasingly rich clinical and/or experimental datasets as well as machine learning techniques to reduce computational costs might increase model reliability at feasible resources. Cardiac biomechanics models provide excellent opportunities to be integrated into clinical workflows, but more refinement and careful validation against clinical data are needed to improve their credibility. In addition, in each context of use, model complexity must be balanced with the associated high computational cost of running these models.

Indexed as

biomechanicscardiac modelcardiac simulationelectro-mechanicselectromechanicsheart modelheart simulationmechanics

Identifiers

PMID38500690
PMCPMC7615748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.