Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38500651›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

The history of families at-risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: what are the impacts of genetic counseling and testing?

Natalia Campacci, Rebeca Silveira Grasel, Henrique de Campos Reis Galvão, Lucas França Garcia, Paula Carvalho Ribeiro, Kercy Fram de Jesus de Sena Pereira, José Roberto Goldim, Patricia Ashton-Prolla, Edenir Inêz Palmero

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Natalia CampacciMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.
Rebeca Silveira GraselMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.
Henrique de Campos Reis GalvãoOncogenetics Department, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.
Lucas França GarciaCentro Universitário Cesumar, Maringá, Brazil.
Paula Carvalho RibeiroOncogenetics Department, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.
Kercy Fram de Jesus de Sena PereiraMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.
José Roberto GoldimHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Patricia Ashton-ProllaHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Edenir Inêz Palmero *Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.
Hospital de Câncer de Barretos · BRHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre · BRCentro Universitário Cesumar · BRInstituto Nacional do Câncer · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cancer Genetic Counseling (CGC) and genetic testing (GT) assume a paramount role for hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome families. We assessed the effects of CGC and GT on women affected by cancer who are at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer predisposition syndrome (HBOC). Methods: This study encompasses four time points: before the CGC session, after the CGC session when blood is drawn for GT, after disclosure of GT results, and six months following disclosure of GT results. The impacts of CGC and GT were assessed using psychosocial questionnaires. Additionally, a pedigree, genogram, and ecomap were constructed through a semistructured interview. Results: A total of sixty women were included in the study. Most participants considered their perception of cancer risk to be equivalent to that of the general population, even among those with pathogenic variants. An increased perception of breast and ovarian cancer risks was associated with a heightened inclination toward religious engagement as a coping mechanism. Patients carrying variants of uncertain significance expressed greater concerns about developing another cancer compared to those who had Discussion: These findings can assist healthcare professionals considering a personalized approaches in clinical practice.

Indexed as

breast and ovarian cancer predisposition syndromefamily dynamicsgenetic counselinggeneticshereditary cancer

Identifiers

PMID38500651
PMCPMC10946339
OpenAlexW4392379690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.