Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38500575›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2024

Global Safety Assessment of Adverse Events of Special Interest Following 2 Years of Use and 772 Million Administered Doses of mRNA-1273.

Veronica Urdaneta, Daina B Esposito, Priyadarshani Dharia, Margot Stam Moraga, Kate Anteyi, Titi Oduyebo-Omotosho, Melissa Rossi, Paul Burton, José M Vega, Rachel Dawson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Efficiency and safety of five different agents forFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Veronica UrdanetaClinical Safety and Risk Management, Moderna, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Daina B EspositoMedical Affairs, Moderna, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Priyadarshani DhariaMedical Affairs, Moderna, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Margot Stam MoragaClinical Safety and Risk Management, Moderna, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Kate AnteyiClinical Safety and Risk Management, Moderna, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Titi Oduyebo-OmotoshoClinical Safety and Risk Management, Moderna, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Melissa RossiClinical Safety and Risk Management, Moderna, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Paul BurtonMedical Affairs, Moderna, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
José M VegaClinical Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Moderna, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Rachel DawsonMedical Affairs, Moderna, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Walter StrausClinical Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Moderna, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1247-4783

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Large-scale use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines during the pandemic was associated with enhanced safety monitoring to ensure accurate and timely review of safety. We reviewed the mRNA-1273 (original strain) safety profile following 2 years of use (>772 million administered doses), primarily focusing on predefined safety topics (ie, adverse events of special interest [AESIs]) proposed in advance of COVID-19 vaccine use. Methods: Cumulative mRNA-1273 safety data were included from spontaneous adverse event (AE) cases reported to Moderna's global safety database between 18 December 2020 and 17 December 2022. Reporting rates of AESIs were calculated per 1 million doses of mRNA-1273 administered. Observed-to-expected (OE) ratios were computed by comparing observed rates of AESIs with the background/expected rate for these events to evaluate potential associations with mRNA-1273. Results: There were 658 759 identified case reports associated with 2 517 669 AEs. Most AEs were nonserious (83.4%; 2 098 954/2 517 669). Overall 0.7% (17 751/2 517 669) were fatal. AESIs represented 13.7% of all AEs (344 921/2 517 669), with reporting rates for most AESIs below the expected background incidence. Exceptions included anaphylaxis (OE ratio 3 days after vaccination, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.93-2.25) and, among individuals aged 12 to 40 years, myocarditis (OE ratio 7 days after any dose, 3.89 [3.50-4.32]; among men after dose 2, 8.57 [6.88-10.68]) and pericarditis (OE ratio 7 days after vaccination, 3.47; 2.89-4.16). Conclusions: This safety analysis of mRNA-1273 identified evidence of increased risk for anaphylaxis, myocarditis, and pericarditis but not for other AESIs identified for enhanced monitoring ahead of COVID-19 vaccine use.

Indexed as

COVID-19mRNA-1273pharmacovigilanceSARS-CoV-2SPIKEVAX

Identifiers

PMID38500575
PMCPMC10946654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.