ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2024
Development and validation a nomogram prediction model for early diagnosis of bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Predictive Model for 28-Day Mortality in Patients with Post-Traumatic Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical features and risk factors of older adults with bloodstream infection.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Development and application of an early prediction model for risk of bloodstream infection based on real-world study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- An interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of Escherichia coli infection in ICU patients.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- An externally validated prognostic model for critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting the risk of bloodstream infections (BSI) in critically ill patients based on their admission status to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Patients and methods: Patients' data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) database (training set), the Beijing Friendship Hospital (BFH) database (validation set) and the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD) (validation set). Univariate logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the influencing factors, and lasso regression was used to select the predictive factors. Model performance was assessed using area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and Presented as a Nomogram. Various aspects of the established predictive nomogram were evaluated, including discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. Results: The model dataset consisted of 14930 patients (1444 BSI patients) from the MIMIC-IV database, divided into the training and internal validation datasets in a 7:3 ratio. The eICU dataset included 2100 patients (100 with BSI) as the eICU validation dataset, and the BFH dataset included 419 patients (21 with BSI) as the BFH validation dataset. The nomogram was constructed based on Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), sepsis related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, white blood cell (WBC), red width of distribution (RDW), renal replacement therapy and presence of liver disease on their admission status to the ICU. The AUROCs were 0.83 (CI 95%:0.81-0.84) in the training dataset, 0.88 (CI 95%:0.88-0.96) in the BFH validation dataset, and 0.75 (95%CI 0.70-0.79) in the eICU validation dataset. The clinical effect curve and decision curve showed that most areas of the decision curve of this model were greater than 0, indicating that this model has a certain clinical effectiveness. Conclusion: The nomogram developed in this study provides a valuable tool for clinicians and nurses to assess individual risk, enabling them to identify patients at a high risk of bloodstream infections in the ICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.