ArticleESC heart failure2024
Assessing the impact of haemodynamic monitoring with CardioMEMS on heart failure patients: a cost-benefit analysis.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of pulmonary artery pressure-guided management on outcomes of patients with heart failure outside clinical trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world evidence with the CardioMEMS Heart Failure System.European journal of heart failure · 2025Pooled it
- Identifying and Comparing Intervention Cost Components in Remote Patient Monitoring: A Scoping Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Article
- Integrating multimodal intelligence in heart failure: AI-driven risk prediction, precision diagnosis, phenotyping, personalized treatment, and prognosis.Chinese medical journal · 2026Review
- Remote pulmonary artery pressure-guided management of patients with heart failure: A clinical consensus statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.European journal of heart failure · 2025Review
- Heart Failure Readmission Prevention Strategies-A Comparative Review of Medications, Devices, and Other Interventions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Heart Failure Patients with Implantable Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitors: A Single Centre Irish Experience.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
- Review
- Study of CardioMEMS in heart failure patients: Study confirms benefit in costs and quality-adjusted life years, but does not measure quality-adjusted life years.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Adequacy of Ambulatory Hemodynamic Assessments for Reducing All-Cause Mortality in Individuals With Heart Failure.International journal of heart failure · 2024Review
- Assessing the impact of haemodynamic monitoring with CardioMEMS on heart failure patients: a cost-benefit analysis.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Reply to: "CardioMEMS in HF patients: study confirms benefit in costs and QALYs, but does not measure QALYs".ESC heart failure · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe objective of this study was to perform a cost-benefit analysis of the CardioMEMS HF System (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA) in a heart failure (HF) clinic in Spain by evaluating the real-time remote monitoring of pulmonary artery pressures, which has been shown to reduce HF-related hospitalizations and improve the quality of life for selected HF patients. Particularly, the study aimed to determine the value of CardioMEMS in Southern Europe, where healthcare costs are significantly lower and its effectiveness remains uncertain. METHODS AND
resultsThis single-centre study enrolled all consecutive HF patients (N = 43) who had been implanted with a pulmonary artery pressure sensor (CardioMEMS HF System); 48.8% were females, aged 75.5 ± 7.0 years, with both reduced and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction; 67.4% of them were in New York Heart Association Class III. The number of HF hospitalizations in the year before and the year after the sensor implantation was compared. Quality-adjusted life years gained based on a literature review of previous studies were calculated. The rate of HF hospitalizations was significantly lower at 1 year compared with the year before CardioMEMS implantation (0.25 vs. 1.10 events/patient-year, hazard ratio 0.22, P = 0.001). At the end of the first year, the usual management outperformed the CardioMEMS HF System. By the end of the second year, the CardioMEMS system is estimated to reduce costs compared with usual management (net benefits of €346).
conclusionsBased on the results, we suggest that remote monitoring of pulmonary artery pressure with the CardioMEMS HF System represents a midterm and long-term efficient strategy in a healthcare setting in Southern Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.