ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2025
The presence and burden of cognitive issues: discordance between the perception of neurologists and people living with multiple sclerosis.
Article in European journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Replicating the real-world evidence methods available in human health to assess burden and outcomes for dogs with chronic kidney disease, their owners, and the veterinary healthcare system in the United States of America.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- The presence and burden of cognitive issues: discordance between the perception of neurologists and people living with multiple sclerosis.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeCognitive impairment is a common symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS) and occurs in more than 40% of people living with MS (plwMS). No real-world study has assessed the perception of neurologists and plwMS on cognitive issues.
methodsUsing data from the 2011-2019 Adelphi MS Disease Specific Programme database, this real-world, retrospective, cross-sectional multi-cohort study included people aged ≥18 years with relapsing-remitting MS and secondary progressive MS from the United States, UK and the EU. Neurologists provided data on the patient record form for plwMS, with the same plwMS invited to voluntarily complete a patient self-completion form: a questionnaire about their experiences with MS.
resultsOf 25,374 plwMS, 4817 who provided information on cognitive and mood symptoms were included in the analysis. Of the plwMS, 68% and 59% reported feeling 'mentally fatigued' and having 'difficulty concentrating', respectively. Neurologists reported only 27% of plwMS as having 'difficulty concentrating' and 15% of plwMS as having 'short-/long-term memory problems'. Neurologists reported cognitive or mood symptoms as 'not experienced' by a higher percentage of participants with relapsing-remitting MS than secondary progressive MS. Of the plwMS who experienced 'difficulty concentrating', most had a concomitant feeling of being 'mentally fatigued' (52%), followed by 'feeling anxious or tense' (49%) and 'feeling depressed' (44%). In plwMS, caregivers reported 'difficulty concentrating' (16%) as the most common cognitive issue.
conclusionA clear discordance was observed between neurologists and plwMS regarding the perception of the cognitive and neuropsychiatric issues. These results underline the under-perception of cognitive and emotional affective symptoms in plwMS during neurological consultations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.