SynthesisBMC psychiatry2024
Actions targeting the integration of peer workforces in mental health organisations: a mixed-methods systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Between Autonomy and Duty. Mental Health Nurses' Experiences of Early Intervention in a Rights-Prioritised Reform Context: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
- Navigating workforce challenges and strategies for sustainable mental health inpatient services-perspectives from Victoria's public mental health sector.International journal of mental health systems · 2026Article
- How Do Engagement Strategies of Peer Support Workers Differ from Traditional Providers? Comparing Across the Dimensions of Function and Form.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- Implementing Peer Support in Community Mental Health Nursing Teams: Qualitative Evaluation.Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing · 2026Article
- Disclosure Impact of Mental Health Conditions in the Workplace: A Scoping Review and a Thematic Analysis.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Between Lived Experience and Professionalisation: Can Personal Assistance Redefine Peer Support in Mental Health?Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- "Is the Service Ready?": Integrating Peer Support Workers Within Community Mental Health: An Ethnographic Study from Trieste and its Region.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- Feasibility and acceptability of a peer-led mindful self-compassion program for adults with eating disorder symptoms.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Peer-supported Open Dialogue: a qualitative study of peer practitioners' experiences and non-peer practitioners' perspectives on peer involvement.BJPsych open · 2025Article
- Identifying 'Where' and 'How' Peer Support for Youth is Integrated into Community-Based Mental Health Services: A Survey Study.Community mental health journal · 2025Article
- The Significance of Lived Experience in the Work of Social Reformer and Nursing Pioneer Elizabeth Fry (1780-1845).International journal of mental health nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLived experience workforces are one of the fastest growing emerging disciplines in Australian mental health service settings. Individuals with lived and living experience of mental distress employed in mental health services, often referred to as peer or lived experience workers, are widely considered essential for mental health recovery and reform. Despite vast growth of this workforce, concerns remain over the widespread integration of peer workforces to align with recommended movement of healthcare services toward greater recovery-orientated and person-centered practices. Previous research has identified barriers for peer work integration including a lack of clear role definition, inadequate training, and poor supportive organisational culture. Stigma, discrimination and a lack of acceptance by colleagues are also common themes. This systematic review seeks to identify organisational actions to support integration of peer workforces for improved mental health service delivery.
methodA systematic search was conducted through online databases (n = 8) between January 1980 to November 2023. Additional data were sourced from conference proceedings, hand searching grey literature and scanning reference lists. Qualitative data was extracted and synthesised utilising narrative synthesis to identify key themes and findings reported adhere to PRISMA guidelines. The review protocol was registered with Prospero (CRD: 42,021,257,013).
resultsFour key actions were identified: education and training, organisational readiness, Structural adjustments, resourcing and support and, demonstrated commitment to peer integration and recovery practice.
conclusionsThe study identifies actions for mental health service organisations and system leaders to adopt in support of integrating peer and lived experience workforces in service delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.