Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38500086›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychiatry2024

Actions targeting the integration of peer workforces in mental health organisations: a mixed-methods systematic review.

Verity Reeves, Heather McIntyre, Mark Loughhead, Matthew Anthony Halpin, Nicholas Procter

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Verity ReevesThe University of South Australia, 5001, Adelaide, GPO Box 2471, South Australia. verity.reeves@mymail.unisa.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6084-3606
Heather McIntyreThe University of South Australia, 5001, Adelaide, GPO Box 2471, South Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8475-769X
Mark LoughheadThe University of South Australia, 5001, Adelaide, GPO Box 2471, South Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3610-1482
Matthew Anthony HalpinThe University of South Australia, 5001, Adelaide, GPO Box 2471, South Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5739-478X
Nicholas ProcterThe University of South Australia, 5001, Adelaide, GPO Box 2471, South Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7289-3165
University of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLived experience workforces are one of the fastest growing emerging disciplines in Australian mental health service settings. Individuals with lived and living experience of mental distress employed in mental health services, often referred to as peer or lived experience workers, are widely considered essential for mental health recovery and reform. Despite vast growth of this workforce, concerns remain over the widespread integration of peer workforces to align with recommended movement of healthcare services toward greater recovery-orientated and person-centered practices. Previous research has identified barriers for peer work integration including a lack of clear role definition, inadequate training, and poor supportive organisational culture. Stigma, discrimination and a lack of acceptance by colleagues are also common themes. This systematic review seeks to identify organisational actions to support integration of peer workforces for improved mental health service delivery.

methodA systematic search was conducted through online databases (n = 8) between January 1980 to November 2023. Additional data were sourced from conference proceedings, hand searching grey literature and scanning reference lists. Qualitative data was extracted and synthesised utilising narrative synthesis to identify key themes and findings reported adhere to PRISMA guidelines. The review protocol was registered with Prospero (CRD: 42,021,257,013).

resultsFour key actions were identified: education and training, organisational readiness, Structural adjustments, resourcing and support and, demonstrated commitment to peer integration and recovery practice.

conclusionsThe study identifies actions for mental health service organisations and system leaders to adopt in support of integrating peer and lived experience workforces in service delivery.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesAustraliaHumansMental HealthWorkforceLived experienceMental healthOrganisational change managementOrganisational learningPeer support

Identifiers

PMID38500086
PMCPMC10949677
OpenAlexW4392911212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.