ArticleSpine deformity2024
Characterizing antibiotic prophylaxis practices in pediatric deformity spinal surgery and impact on 30-day postoperative infection: an NSQIP pediatric database study.
Article in Spine deformity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to characterize antibiotic prophylaxis practices in pediatric patients who have received posterior arthrodesis for spinal deformity and understand how these practices impact 30-day postoperative infection rates.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database for year 2021. Patients 18 years of age or younger who received posterior arthrodesis for scoliosis or kyphosis correction were included. The outcome of interest was 30-day postoperative infection. Fisher's exact test and multivariable regression analysis were used to analyze the impact of intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis, intraoperative intravenous antibiotic redosing after 4 h, postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, intraoperative topical antibiotics on 30-day postoperative infection, and various antibiotic prophylaxis regimens.
resultsA total of 6974 patients were included in this study. The 30-day infection rate was 2.9%. Presurgical intravenous antibiotic (11.5% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.005), postoperative antibiotic (5.7% vs. 2.4%, p < 0.01), and intraoperative topical antibiotic (4.0% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.019) were associated with significantly reduced infection rates. There was no significant difference in infection rates between patients that received cefazolin versus vancomycin versus clindamycin. The addition of Gram-negative coverage did not result in significant differences in infection rates. Multivariable regression analysis found postoperative intravenous antibiotics and intraoperative topical antibiotics to reduce infection rates.
conclusionsWe found the use of presurgical intravenous antibiotics, postoperative intravenous antibiotics, and intraoperative topical antibiotics to significantly reduce infection rates. Results from this study can be applied to future research on implementation of standardized infection prevention protocols. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.