ArticleSurgical endoscopy2024
Achievement of textbook outcome after hepatectomy combined with thermal ablation for colorectal liver metastases.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laparoscopic versus robotic surgery in the setting of combined resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases: an experience from the I Go MILS registry.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic resection combined with ablation for multiple colorectal liver metastases: a multicentre propensity-matched analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- How Can We Improve the Survival of Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Thermal Ablation?Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHepatic resection combined with intraoperative ablation has been described as a technical solution potentially widening the resectability rate of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Nevertheless, the perioperative and oncological benefit provided by this combined approach remains unclear. We hypothesized that textbook outcome (TO), which is a composite measure achieved for patients for whom some desired health indicators are met, may help to refine the indications of this approach.
methodsPatients submitted to hepatectomy with curative intent in combination with radiofrequency ablation or microwave ablation for CRLM ≤ 3 cm in two tertiary referral centers were included. TO was defined according to a recent definition for liver surgery based on a Delphi process including also the achievement of complete radiological response of the ablated lesion/s at 4 weeks.
resultsBetween 2015 and 2022, 112 patients were enrolled. Among them, 63 (56.2%) achieved a TO. According to multivariate analysis, minimally invasive (MI) approach (OR 2.72, 95% CI 0.99-7.48, p = 0.050), simultaneous CR resection (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.11-0.70, p = 0.007), tumor burden score (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.96, p = 0.004), and major hepatectomy (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03-0.52, p = 0.004) were significantly associated with the achievement of TO. Median overall survival was longer in those patients who were able to achieve a TO compared to those who did not.
conclusionsThe combination of hepatectomy and ablation constitutes a valuable solution in patients affected by multiple CRLM and it may provide, also using a MI approach, adequate perioperative and oncological outcomes, allowing to achieve TO, however, in a selected number of patients and depending on several factors including the burden of disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38499784What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.