ArticleSurgical endoscopy2024
New gel immersion endoscopic ultrasonography technique for accurate periampullary evaluation.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gel immersion in endoscopy: Exploring potential applications.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Ampullary Lesion Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVisualization of the pancreatobiliary junction is one of the challenges faced by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). The water-filling technique, which allows for the observation of the ampulla at a suitable distance by injecting water into the lumen of the duodenum, was used for this purpose. However, a new gel immersion technique has recently been introduced for visualizing the gastrointestinal tract. This study investigated the effectiveness of visualizing the pancreatobiliary junction in EUS by comparing both water filling and the new gel immersion technique in identical cases.
methodsThe study ran from June to December 2021. Ten images from each technique were retrospectively compared by three independent researchers. The primary result of the study was the number of images depicting the "Pancreatic and Biliary Ducts Penetrating the Duodenal Muscularis Propria" (defined as Excellent observation) in each technique. The secondary outcome was defined as gel immersion technique's safety and impact on duodenal lumen distension.
resultsTen patients used the gel immersion technique. All patients underwent the water-filling technique first, followed by gel injection after the water was completely aspirated. The average number of pictures rated as "Excellent observation," which is the primary outcome, was significantly higher with the gel immersion technique than with water filling, and no adverse events were observed. The subanalysis revealed that both convex and radial echoendoscopes are equally effective at depicting the ampulla with the gel immersion technique.
conclusionsThe ability to depict the pancreatobiliary junction using the gel immersion technique is superior to that of the water-filling method, which may allow for a more detailed assessment of the ampullary region with both radial and convex echoendoscopes. This can be a useful EUS technique for diagnosing pancreaticobiliary maljunction or periampullary tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38499782What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.