ArticleScientific reports2024
Investigating the potential roles of intra-colonial genetic variability in Pocillopora corals using genomics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chimerism as a strategy to improve the resilience of boulder corals.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Adaptive Potential of Intracolonial Genetic Variability in Coral Populations.Ecology and evolution · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intra-colonial genetic variability (IGV), the presence of more than one genotype in a single colony, has been increasingly studied in scleractinians, revealing its high prevalence. Several studies hypothesised that IGV brings benefits, but few have investigated its roles from a genetic perspective. Here, using genomic data (SNPs), we investigated these potential benefits in populations of the coral Pocillopora acuta from Reunion Island (southwestern Indian Ocean). As the detection of IGV depends on sequencing and bioinformatics errors, we first explored the impact of the bioinformatics pipeline on its detection. Then, SNPs and genes variable within colonies were characterised. While most of the tested bioinformatics parameters did not significantly impact the detection of IGV, filtering on genotype depth of coverage strongly improved its detection by reducing genotyping errors. Mosaicism and chimerism, the two processes leading to IGV (the first through somatic mutations, the second through fusion of distinct organisms), were found in 7% and 12% of the colonies, respectively. Both processes led to several intra-colonial allelic differences, but most were non-coding or silent. However, 7% of the differences were non-silent and found in genes involved in a high diversity of biological processes, some of which were directly linked to responses to environmental stresses. IGV, therefore, appears as a source of genetic diversity and genetic plasticity, increasing the adaptive potential of colonies. Such benefits undoubtedly play an important role in the maintenance and the evolution of scleractinian populations and appear crucial for the future of coral reefs in the context of ongoing global changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.