ArticleInternational orthopaedics2024
Development of a diagnostic support system for distal humerus fracture using artificial intelligence.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in virtual fracture clinics: a systematic review of imaging and clinical-text tools.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Pooled it
- Addressing fractures that are hard to diagnose on imaging: Radiomics or deep learning?La Radiologia medica · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery: A Comprehensive Review From Diagnosis to Rehabilitation.Cureus · 2025Review
- Factors influencing elbow function after internal fixation of complex distal humeral fractures in adults.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in the interpretation of upper extremity trauma radiographs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2025Review
- Comparative analysis of elbow radiographic measurements in patients with supracondylar humerus fractures and healthy controls.World journal of orthopedics · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in fracture detection on radiographs: a literature review.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Context-Aware Dual-Task Deep Network for Concurrent Bone Segmentation and Clinical Assessment to Enhance Shoulder Arthroplasty Preoperative planning.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAI has shown promise in automating and improving various tasks, including medical image analysis. Distal humerus fractures are a critical clinical concern that requires early diagnosis and treatment to avoid complications. The standard diagnostic method involves X-ray imaging, but subtle fractures can be missed, leading to delayed or incorrect diagnoses. Deep learning, a subset of artificial intelligence, has demonstrated the ability to automate medical image analysis tasks, potentially improving fracture identification accuracy and reducing the need for additional and cost-intensive imaging modalities (Schwarz et al. 2023). This study aims to develop a deep learning-based diagnostic support system for distal humerus fractures using conventional X-ray images. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether deep learning can provide reliable image-based fracture detection recommendations for distal humerus fractures.
methodsBetween March 2017 and March 2022, our tertiary hospital's PACS data were evaluated for conventional radiography images of the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral elbow for suspected traumatic distal humerus fractures. The data set consisted of 4931 images of patients seven years and older, after excluding paediatric images below seven years due to the absence of ossification centres. Two senior orthopaedic surgeons with 12 + years of experience reviewed and labelled the images as fractured or normal. The data set was split into training sets (79.88%) and validation tests (20.1%). Image pre-processing was performed by cropping the images to 224 × 224 pixels around the capitellum, and the deep learning algorithm architecture used was ResNet18.
resultsThe deep learning model demonstrated an accuracy of 69.14% in the validation test set, with a specificity of 95.89% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 99.47%. However, the sensitivity was 61.49%, indicating that the model had a relatively high false negative rate. ROC analysis showed an AUC of 0.787 when deep learning AI was the reference and an AUC of 0.580 when the most senior orthopaedic surgeon was the reference. The performance of the model was compared with that of other orthopaedic surgeons of varying experience levels, showing varying levels of diagnostic precision.
conclusionThe developed deep learning-based diagnostic support system shows potential for accurately diagnosing distal humerus fractures using AP and lateral elbow radiographs. The model's specificity and PPV indicate its ability to mark out occult lesions and has a high false positive rate. Further research and validation are necessary to improve the sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of the model for practical clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.