Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38499635›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

AI-based betting anomaly detection system to ensure fairness in sports and prevent illegal gambling.

Changgyun Kim, Jae-Hyeon Park, Ji-Yong Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Changgyun KimDepartment of Artificial Intelligence & Software, Kangwon National University, Samcheok, 25913, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8392-9055
Jae-Hyeon ParkCenter for Sports and Performance Analysis, Korea National Sport University, Seoul, 05541, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1428-0168
Ji-Yong LeeCenter for Sports and Performance Analysis, Korea National Sport University, Seoul, 05541, Republic of Korea. 302479@knsu.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0003-4470-5339

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2020S1A5A2A03044544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study develops a solution to sports match-fixing using various machine-learning models to detect match-fixing anomalies, based on betting odds. We use five models to distinguish between normal and abnormal matches: logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), the k-nearest neighbor (KNN) classification, and the ensemble model-a model optimized from the previous four. The models classify normal and abnormal matches by learning their patterns using sports betting odds data. The database was developed based on the world football league match betting data of 12 betting companies, which offered a vast collection of data on players, teams, game schedules, and league rankings for football matches. We develop an abnormal match detection model based on the data analysis results of each model, using the match result dividend data. We then use data from real-time matches and apply the five models to construct a system capable of detecting match-fixing in real time. The RF, KNN, and ensemble models recorded a high accuracy, over 92%, whereas the LR and SVM models were approximately 80% accurate. In comparison, previous studies have used a single model to examine football match betting odds data, with an accuracy of 70-80%.

Indexed as

FootballGamblingArtificial IntelligenceHumansLogistic ModelsEnsemble modelk-Nearest neighborLogistic regressionMatch-fixingRandom forestSupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID38499635
PMCPMC10948790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.