ArticleScientific reports2024
Generating 3D images of material microstructures from a single 2D image: a denoising diffusion approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stereological reconstructions of 3D cellular microstructures by combining adversarial learning and Voronoi tessellations.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Infinite Cluster Function as a Descriptor of Through-Plane Effective Conductivity in Porous Electrodes of Membrane Electrode Assemblies.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Morphology prediction of small nanoparticles in any orientation from single electron micrographs.npj computational materials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) images provide a comprehensive view of material microstructures, enabling numerical simulations unachievable with two-dimensional (2D) imaging alone. However, obtaining these 3D images can be costly and constrained by resolution limitations. We introduce a novel method capable of generating large-scale 3D images of material microstructures, such as metal or rock, from a single 2D image. Our approach circumvents the need for 3D image data while offering a cost-effective, high-resolution alternative to existing imaging techniques. Our method combines a denoising diffusion probabilistic model with a generative adversarial network framework. To compensate for the lack of 3D training data, we implement chain sampling, a technique that utilizes the 3D intermediate outputs obtained by reversing the diffusion process. During the training phase, these intermediate outputs are guided by a 2D discriminator. This technique facilitates our method's ability to gradually generate 3D images that accurately capture the geometric properties and statistical characteristics of the original 2D input. This study features a comparative analysis of the 3D images generated by our method, SliceGAN (the current state-of-the-art method), and actual 3D micro-CT images, spanning a diverse set of rock and metal types. The results shown an improvement of up to three times in the Frechet inception distance score, a typical metric for evaluating the performance of image generative models, and enhanced accuracy in derived properties compared to SliceGAN. The potential of our method to produce high-resolution and statistically representative 3D images paves the way for new applications in material characterization and analysis domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.