ArticleScientific reports2024
Ultra-compact and efficient photonic waveguide bends with different configurations designed by topology optimization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Design of Ultra-Compact and High-Efficiency Waveguide Bends on Lithium Niobate Thin Films.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biosynthetic optical waveguide interface integration using biomimetic -Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Inverse design of 3D nanophotonic devices with structural integrity using auxiliary thermal solvers.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Article
- Inverse design of nanophotonic devices enabled by optimization algorithms and deep learning: recent achievements and future prospects.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transporting light signals over the corners and sharp bends imposes high optical loss and distortion on the mode profiles. Usually, bends with larger radii are used in circuits to minimize the loss over transmission, resulting in a severe limitation in integration density. In this paper, we propose novel topology-optimized optimized L-bend and U-bend structures designed for a 220 nm silicon-on-insulator (SOI) platform. Optimized L-bends with footprints of 2.5 µm × 2.5 µm, 1.5 µm × 1.5 µm, and 1 µm × 1 µm show maximum insertion losses of only 0.07 dB, 0.26 dB, and 0.78 dB, respectively. For optimized U-bends with footprints of 3 µm × 3.6 µm, 2.5 µm × 2.5 µm, and 1.5 µm × 1.5 µm, the maximum insertion losses are 0.07 dB, 0.21 dB, and 3.16 dB. These optimized bends reduce the maximum insertion loss by over 50% compared to un-optimized arc-type bends across a broad wavelength range of 1450-1650 nm. Experimental verification of a meander line with 16 optimized U-bends (3 µm × 3.6 µm) demonstrates an averaged insertion loss of 1.23 dB in the wavelength range of 1520-1580 nm, agreeing with simulated results and indicating a high potential of loss reduction with optimized bends.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.