Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38499489›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2024

Probability of normal tissue complications for hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicity in postoperative whole pelvic radiotherapy for gynecologic malignancies using intensity-modulated proton therapy with robust optimization.

Takaaki Yoshimura, Ryota Yamada, Rumiko Kinoshita, Taeko Matsuura, Takahiro Kanehira, Hiroshi Tamura, Kentaro Nishioka, Koichi Yasuda, Hiroshi Taguchi, Norio Katoh and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takaaki YoshimuraDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan.
Ryota YamadaDepartment of Radiation Technology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
Rumiko KinoshitaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
Taeko MatsuuraDepartment of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
Takahiro KanehiraDepartment of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
Hiroshi TamuraDepartment of Radiation Technology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
Kentaro NishiokaGlobal Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
Koichi YasudaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
Hiroshi TaguchiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
Norio KatohDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
Keiji KobashiGlobal Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
Takayuki HashimotoGlobal Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
Hidefumi AoyamaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
Hokkaido University Hospital · JPHokkaido University · JP

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI 18K15577Regional R&D Proposal-Based Program from Northern Advancement Center for Science & Technology of Hokkaido Japan
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This retrospective treatment-planning study was conducted to determine whether intensity-modulated proton therapy with robust optimization (ro-IMPT) reduces the risk of acute hematologic toxicity (H-T) and acute and late gastrointestinal toxicity (GI-T) in postoperative whole pelvic radiotherapy for gynecologic malignancies when compared with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated X-ray (IMXT) and single-field optimization proton beam (SFO-PBT) therapies. All plans were created for 13 gynecologic-malignancy patients. The prescribed dose was 45 GyE in 25 fractions for 95% planning target volume in 3D-CRT, IMXT and SFO-PBT plans and for 99% clinical target volume (CTV) in ro-IMPT plans. The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of each toxicity was used as an in silico surrogate marker. Median estimated NTCP values for acute H-T and acute and late GI-T were 0.20, 0.94 and 0.58 × 10-1 in 3D-CRT; 0.19, 0.65 and 0.24 × 10-1 in IMXT; 0.04, 0.74 and 0.19 × 10-1 in SFO-PBT; and 0.06, 0.66 and 0.15 × 10-1 in ro-IMPT, respectively. Compared with 3D-CRT and IMXT plans, the ro-IMPT plan demonstrated significant reduction in acute H-T and late GI-T. The risk of acute GI-T in ro-IMPT plan is equivalent with IMXT plan. The ro-IMPT plan demonstrated potential clinical benefits for reducing the risk of acute H-T and late GI-T in the treatment of gynecologic malignances by reducing the dose to the bone marrow and bowel bag while maintaining adequate dose coverage to the CTV. Our results indicated that ro-IMPT may reduce acute H-T and late GI-T risk with potentially improving outcomes for postoperative gynecologic-malignancy patients with concurrent chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Genital Neoplasms, FemaleProton TherapyRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedAdultAgedFemaleGastrointestinal TractHumansMiddle AgedOrgans at RiskPelvisPostoperative PeriodProbabilityRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapy Dosageintensity-modulated proton therapynormal tissue complication probability modeling analysisretrospective treatment-planning studyrobust optimization

Identifiers

PMID38499489
PMCPMC11115445
OpenAlexW4392968917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.