ArticleNucleic acids research2024
Exhaustive identification of genome-wide binding events of transcriptional regulators.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- CUT&ID for simultaneous profiling of protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Differential Wnt/β-catenin signaling via TCF7L2/LEF1 binding specificity shapes cellular and tumor phenotypes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Commentary on 'Untargeted CUT&Tag reads are enriched at accessible chromatin and restrict identification of potential G4-forming sequences in G4-targeted CUT&Tag experiments'.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- NanoTag is an improved method to map interactions between DNA and proteins not requiring IgG.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The developmental factor TBX3 engages with the Wnt/β-catenin transcriptional complex in colorectal cancer to regulate metastasis genes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Predicting gene expression from histone marks using chromatin deep learning models depends on histone mark function, regulatory distance and cellular states.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome-wide binding assays aspire to map the complete binding pattern of gene regulators. Common practice relies on replication-duplicates or triplicates-and high stringency statistics to favor false negatives over false positives. Here we show that duplicates and triplicates of CUT&RUN are not sufficient to discover the entire activity of transcriptional regulators. We introduce ICEBERG (Increased Capture of Enrichment By Exhaustive Replicate aGgregation), a pipeline that harnesses large numbers of CUT&RUN replicates to discover the full set of binding events and chart the line between false positives and false negatives. We employed ICEBERG to map the full set of H3K4me3-marked regions, the targets of the co-factor β-catenin, and those of the transcription factor TBX3, in human colorectal cancer cells. The ICEBERG datasets allow benchmarking of individual replicates, comparing the performance of peak calling and replication approaches, and expose the arbitrary nature of strategies to identify reproducible peaks. Instead of a static view of genomic targets, ICEBERG establishes a spectrum of detection probabilities across the genome for a given factor, underlying the intrinsic dynamicity of its mechanism of action, and permitting to distinguish frequent from rare regulation events. Finally, ICEBERG discovered instances, undetectable with other approaches, that underlie novel mechanisms of colorectal cancer progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.