Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38498705›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Equity and modeling in sustainability science: Examples and opportunities throughout the process.

Amanda Giang, Morgan R Edwards, Sarah M Fletcher, Rivkah Gardner-Frolick, Rowenna Gryba, Jean-Denis Mathias, Camille Venier-Cambron, John M Anderies, Emily Berglund, Sanya Carley and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Showcasing advances and building community in modeling for sustainability.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Amanda GiangInstitute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0146-7038
Morgan R EdwardsLa Follette School of Public Affairs, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.ORCID 0000-0001-9296-7865
Sarah M FletcherDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0003-3289-2237
Rivkah Gardner-FrolickDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4510-6744
Rowenna GrybaDepartment of Statistics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0426-8034
Jean-Denis MathiasUniversité Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, UR LISC, Centre de Clermont-Ferrand, Aubière F-63178, France.
Camille Venier-CambronDepartment of Environmental Geography, Instituut voor Milieuvraagstukken, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7675-930X
John M AnderiesSchool of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287.ORCID 0000-0002-0138-8655
Emily BerglundDepartment of Civil Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.
Sanya CarleyKleinman Center for Energy Policy, Stuart Weitzman School of Design, Department of City Planning, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.ORCID 0000-0001-9599-4519
Jacob Shimkus EricksonNelson Institute Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.
Emily GrubertKeough School of Global Affairs, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556.ORCID 0000-0003-2196-7571
Antonia HadjimichaelDepartment of Geosciences, College of Earth and Mineral Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.ORCID 0000-0001-7330-6834
Jason HillDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.ORCID 0000-0001-7609-6713
Erin MayfieldThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755.ORCID 0000-0001-9843-8905
Destenie NockDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.ORCID 0000-0003-1739-7027
Kimberly Kivvaq PikokInternational Arctic Research Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775.
Rebecca K SaariDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7899-7558
Mateo Samudio LezcanoDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.ORCID 0000-0003-2565-5487
Afreen SiddiqiDepartment of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0002-3786-5644
Jennifer B SkerkerDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0001-7022-6337
Christopher W TessumDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801.ORCID 0000-0002-8864-7436

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) VIRGO Project - ANR-16-CE03-0003National Science Foundation (NSF) 2121730Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) 435-2018-0379
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Equity is core to sustainability, but current interventions to enhance sustainability often fall short in adequately addressing this linkage. Models are important tools for informing action, and their development and use present opportunities to center equity in process and outcomes. This Perspective highlights progress in integrating equity into systems modeling in sustainability science, as well as key challenges, tensions, and future directions. We present a conceptual framework for equity in systems modeling, focused on its distributional, procedural, and recognitional dimensions. We discuss examples of how modelers engage with these different dimensions throughout the modeling process and from across a range of modeling approaches and topics, including water resources, energy systems, air quality, and conservation. Synthesizing across these examples, we identify significant advances in enhancing procedural and recognitional equity by reframing models as tools to explore pluralism in worldviews and knowledge systems; enabling models to better represent distributional inequity through new computational techniques and data sources; investigating the dynamics that can drive inequities by linking different modeling approaches; and developing more nuanced metrics for assessing equity outcomes. We also identify important future directions, such as an increased focus on using models to identify pathways to transform underlying conditions that lead to inequities and move toward desired futures. By looking at examples across the diverse fields within sustainability science, we argue that there are valuable opportunities for mutual learning on how to use models more effectively as tools to support sustainable and equitable futures.

Indexed as

equityinequalitymodelingnature-society systems

Identifiers

PMID38498705
PMCPMC10990085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.