Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38498322›Full record

ArticleTree physiology2024

Optimal carbon storage during drought.

Elisa Z Stefaniak, David T Tissue, Roderick C Dewar, Belinda E Medlyn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tree physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Growth-defense trade-offs inFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elisa Z StefaniakBiodiversity Ecology and Conservation Research Group, Biodiversity and Natural Resources Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Schlossplatz 1, Laxenburg 2361, Austria.
David T TissueHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Hawkesbury Campus, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, New South Wales 2751, Australia.
Roderick C DewarFaculty of Science, Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, Helsinki 00014, Finland.
Belinda E MedlynHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Hawkesbury Campus, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, New South Wales 2751, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council Discovery DP160103436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allocation of non-structural carbohydrates to storage allows plants to maintain a carbon pool in anticipation of future stress. However, to do so, plants must forego use of the carbon for growth, creating a trade-off between storage and growth. It is possible that plants actively regulate the storage pool to maximize fitness in a stress-prone environment. Here, we attempt to identify the patterns of growth and storage that would result during drought stress under the hypothesis that plants actively regulate carbon storage. We use optimal control theory to calculate the optimal allocation to storage and utilization of stored carbon over a single drought stress period. We examine two fitness objectives representing alternative life strategies: prioritization of growth and prioritization of storage, as well as the strategies in between these extremes. We find that optimal carbon storage consists of three discrete phases: 'growth', 'storage without growth' and the 'stress' phase where there is no carbon source. This trajectory can be defined by the time point when the plant switches from growth to storage. Growth-prioritizing plants switch later and fully deplete their stored carbon over the stress period, while storage-prioritizing plants either do not grow or switch early in the drought period. The switch time almost always occurs before the soil water is depleted, meaning that growth stops before photosynthesis. We conclude that the common observation of increasing carbon storage during drought could be interpreted as an active process that optimizes plant performance during stress.

Indexed as

CarbonDroughtsTreesPhotosynthesisStress, PhysiologicalWaterCarbonWateractive storagecarbon sourcedynamic optimizationgrowth–storage trade-offnon-structural carbohydratesoptimal response

Identifiers

PMID38498322
PMCPMC11898659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.