Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38498237›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024

hinotori

Yasuo Kohjimoto, Shimpei Yamashita, Sohei Iwagami, Satoshi Muraoka, Takahito Wakamiya, Isao Hara

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Effects of Modifying Hinotori Surgical Robot System on the Learning Curve of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yasuo KohjimotoDepartment of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-0012, Japan.
Shimpei YamashitaDepartment of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-0012, Japan. keito608@wakayama-med.ac.jp.
Sohei IwagamiDepartment of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-0012, Japan.
Satoshi MuraokaDepartment of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-0012, Japan.
Takahito WakamiyaDepartment of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-0012, Japan.
Isao HaraDepartment of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-0012, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

hinotori™ is a recently developed surgical robot system. The present study aims to compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) by the hinotori™ system compared with those of the longer-established da Vinci

Indexed as

RoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansMalePropensity ScoreProstatectomyTreatment Outcomeda VincihinotoriPropensity score-matchingRobot-assisted radical prostatectomySurgical outcomes

Identifiers

PMID38498237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.